16
and this point is useful in the study of “names and languages,” “the foundations of religion,” and “jurisprudence,” as well as in understanding “translation between languages.”
Moreover, in ordinary usage, speakers do not all pronounce a given language or expression in precisely the same way, without any variation whatsoever. If the intended purpose is achieved by all these pronunciations, then the same applies to a single meaning. Although languages differ, translation may still convey the essential intended meaning. The same applies to meanings, for translation concerns both wording and meaning. This is why the Muslims called Ibn ʿAbbās the interpreter of the Quran: he interpreted its wording.
وَهَذَا مَوْضِعٌ يُنْتَفَعُ بِهِ فِي
" الْأَسْمَاءِ وَاللُّغَاتِ "
وَ
" فِي أُصُولِ الدِّينِ "
وَ
" الْفِقْهِ "
وَفِي مَعْرِفَةِ
" تَرْجَمَةِ اللُّغَاتِ "
.
وَأَيْضًا:
لَمْ يَجْرِ الْعُرْفُ بِأَنَّ اللُّغَةَ الْوَاحِدَةَ وَاللَّفْظَ الْوَاحِدَ يَكُونُ النُّطْقُ بِهِ مِنْ جَمِيعِ النَّاطِقِينَ عَلَى حَدٍّ وَاحِدٍ لَيْسَ فِيهِ تَفَاوُتٌ أَصْلًا فَإِنْ حَصَلَ الْمَقْصُودُ بِالْجَمِيعِ فَكَذَلِكَ الْمَعْنَى الْوَاحِدُ فَإِنَّ اللُّغَاتِ وَإِنْ اخْتَلَفَتْ فَقَدْ يَحْصُلُ أَصْلُ الْمَقْصُودِ بِالتَّرْجَمَةِ فَكَذَلِكَ الْمَعَانِي: فَإِنَّ التَّرْجَمَةَ تَكُونُ فِي اللَّفْظِ وَالْمَعْنَى. وَلِهَذَا سَمَّى الْمُسْلِمُونَ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ تُرْجُمَانَ الْقُرْآنِ وَهُوَ يُتَرْجِمُ اللَّفْظَ.