Manāsik al-ḤajjIbn Taimiya

though he is not required to do so, nor is the pilgrim instructed to perfume himself prior to entering iḥrām (1)(2); for the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, did so himself yet did not enjoin it upon the people. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, never required anyone to recite a particular wording. One may simply say, “He entered into the rites of ḥajj,” or, “He entered into ʿumrah,” or say, “He proclaimed the talbiyah for ḥajj,” or, “He proclaimed the talbiyah for ʿumrah” (3). This is the explanation of the Almighty’s statement:

“Hajj is in well-known months; so whoever undertakes the pilgrimage during them must refrain from sexual intimacy, from sin, and from disputation during the pilgrimage” (Quran 2:197).

It is rigorously authenticated (4) in the two Ṣaḥīḥs (5) that he said: “Whoever performs pilgrimage to this House and neither engages in rafath nor commits fusuq shall return from his sins like the day his mother bore him” (6).

This pertains to the recitation that reads, “so there is no rafath and no fusuq,” with the words in the nominative case (7). Rafath denotes sexual intercourse, whether in word or deed, while fusuq is a comprehensive term for acts of disobedience.

(1) In copy D the wording is: “and the muhrim (pilgrim already in ihram) is not instructed to do that before entering ihram.” (2) The authoritative view is that it is recommended to apply perfume before ihram; see Sharh al-Muntaha 1/528. (3) The word “aw” (or) is missing from copies C and D. (4) Copies C and D read: “and it has been established.” (5) Reported by al-Bukhari, 1521, and Muslim, 1350, on the authority of Abu Hurayra (may Allah be pleased with him). (6) Copies C and D read: “left.” (7) Al-Azhari states in Maani al-Qiraat 1/196: “Ibn Kathir, Abu Amr and Yaqub recite: fa-la rafathun wa-la fusuqun—both words in the nominative with tanwin—whereas the other reciters render them in the accusative without tanwin as a declaration of absolution. They all agree on reading the lam in wa-la jidala fil-hajj in the accusative. He adds: ‘If it were recited wa-la jidalu (nominative with tanwin), that too would be permissible.’”
الْمُحْرِمُ قبلَ الإحرامِ بذلكَ (١) (٢) ؛ فإنَّ النبيَّ صلَّى اللَّهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ فعلَهُ ولم يأمُرْ بهِ الناسَ. ولم يكنِ النبيُّ صلَّى اللَّهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ يأمُرُ أحدًا بعبارةٍ بعينِها، وإنَّما يقالُ: أَهَلَّ بالحجِّ، أَهَلَّ بالعمرةِ، أو يقالُ: لَبَّى بالحجِّ، أو (٣) لَبَّى بالعمرةِ، وهوَ تأويلُ قولِه تعالَى: {الْحَجُّ أَشْهُرٌ مَعْلُومَاتٌ فَمَنْ فَرَضَ فِيهِنَّ الْحَجَّ فَلَا رَفَثَ وَلَا فُسُوقَ وَلَا جِدَالَ فِي الْحَجِّ} [البقرة: ١٩٧] . وقد ثَبَتَ (٤) عنه في الصحيحَيْنِ (٥) أنَّهُ قالَ: «مَنْ حَجَّ هَذَا الْبَيْتَ فَلَمْ يَرْفُثْ وَلَمْ يَفْسُقْ؛ رَجَعَ (٦) مِنْ ذُنُوبِهِ كَيَوْمَ وَلَدَتْهُ أُمُّهُ». وهذَا على قراءةِ مَن قَرَأَ: {فَلَا رَفَثٌ وَلَا فُسُوقٌ} بالرفعِ (٧) ، فالرَّفَثُ: اسمٌ للجِمَاعِ قولًا وعملًا، والفسوقُ: اسمٌ للمعاصِي
(١) في (د): (ولا يُؤْمَرُ بذلكَ الْمُحْرِمُ قبلَ الإحرامِ). (٢) والمذهب: يستحب التطيب قبل الإحرام. ينظر: شرح المنتهى ١/ ٥٢٨. (٣) قوله: (أو) سقط من (ج) و (د). (٤) في (ج) و (د): (وثبت). (٥) أخرجه البخاري (١٥٢١)، ومسلم (١٣٥٠) من حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه. (٦) في (ج) و (د): (خرج). (٧) قال الأزهري في معاني القراءات ١/ ١٩٦: (قرأ ابن كثير وأبو عمرو ويعقوب: (فلا رفثٌ ولا فسوقٌ) رفعًا بالتنوين، وقرأ الباقون نصبًا غير منوَّن، على التبرئة، واتفقوا كلهم على نصب اللام من قوله: (ولا جدالَ في الحج)، وقال: (ولو قرئ: (ولا جدالٌ) بالرفع والتنوين كان ذلك جائزًا في =

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies