Lessons Drawn from the Ḥadīth:
-
It is best for the commander or leader to remain at the rear of the army or caravan, waiting for those who are weak or have fallen behind. The ḥadīth states: “The weak person is the leader of the caravan.”
-
The Prophet’s ﷺ mercy and compassion for his community: when he saw Jābir in that state he supported him—first with supplication and then by striking the camel, which by Allah’s permission became strong enough to keep moving.
-
A great miracle among his ﷺ miracles, plainly proving that he is truly the Messenger of Allah: he came to the exhausted, lagging camel, struck it, and it immediately travelled briskly until it rejoined the army.
-
The permissibility of buying and selling between the imām (leader) and his subjects.
-
Refusing a request from the Prophet ﷺ in matters of this kind is not considered sinful, disrespectful, or disobedient, for such requests are not binding commands but offers and encouragement. A similar case is that of Barīrah, when he interceded with her to return to her husband Mughīth. She asked, “Are you commanding me to do so?” He replied, “No, I am only interceding.” She said, “I have no need of him.” The Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) understood that compliance in such matters was not obligatory; otherwise they would have hastened to obey.
-
Ibn Rajab (may Allah have mercy on him) derived from this ḥadīth a general rule: a person may transfer ownership of something while reserving for himself a specified, known benefit for a defined period. This applies to every kind of lease, gift, endowment, or bequest—except sexual relations with a slave woman, for that benefit is lawful only through marriage or legal ownership.
-
It is permissible to sell an item while excluding a particular benefit, provided that the excluded benefit is clearly defined. This question is a subset of the previous rule, and the scholarly difference on it will be addressed, Allah willing.
Scholarly Disagreement
The jurists disagreed: May the seller stipulate a specific benefit in the sold property—for example, living in the house he has sold for one month? May the buyer likewise stipulate a defined benefit from the seller, such as requiring him to transport the purchased goods to a certain place or to sew the garment sold?
The three Imams—Abū Ḥanīfah, Mālik, and al-Shāfiʿī—held that both the contract and the condition are invalid, although Mālik allowed the condition of riding the animal to a nearby destination.