Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

And al-Dhahabi critiqued him, saying:

“I say: Neither of the two Shaykhs narrated from Abu ʿAshanah.”

I say: His name was Hayy ibn Yuʾmin, and he was trustworthy.

Al-Sindi said in his marginal notes on al-Nasaʾi:

“Regarding the phrase, ‘his household [from wearing] jewelry’: ḥilyah (jewelry) is vocalized with a kasrah followed by a sukūn. Its apparent meaning is that he forbade his wives from wearing jewelry altogether, whether of gold or silver. Perhaps this was particular to them, so that they would prefer the Hereafter to this world. The same applies to silk. It is also possible that ‘household’ here means the male members of the household, in which case the matter is clear.”

I say: This possibility is far-fetched and not the apparent meaning. Therefore, reliance is to be placed on what he mentioned first. And Allah knows best.

I say: Thus, this hadith indicates, just as the well-known hadith cited shortly before does, that silk is permissible for all other women. It may nevertheless be said that it is preferable for them to refrain from it, and from jewelry altogether, in emulation of his wives, may Allah bless him and grant him peace—especially since it is authentically established that he said:

“Woe to women because of the two red things: gold and safflower-dyed clothing.”

339 — “Woe to women because of the two red things: gold and safflower-dyed clothing.”

Ibn Hibban (1464) transmitted it: Al-Hasan ibn Sufyan informed us; Surayj ibn Yunus related to us; ʿAbbad ibn ʿAbbad related to us, from Muhammad ibn ʿAmr, from Abu Salamah, from Abu Hurayrah, from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, who said this.

Al-Bayhaqi also transmitted it in Shuʿab al-Iman (2/230/2, Maktab al-Islami facsimile edition), through the route of Abu Hatim al-Razi, who related to us from Surayj ibn Yunus through the same chain.

I say: This is a good chain of transmission. All its narrators are trustworthy narrators of the two Shaykhs, apart from al-Hasan ibn Sufyan al-Fasawi, who was a trustworthy, well-known hadith memorizer.

Muhammad ibn ʿAmr was Ibn ʿAlqamah. Al-Bukhari narrated from him in conjunction with another narrator, and Muslim cited him in corroboration.

As for al-Manawi’s statement in Fayd al-Qadir, after attributing it—following his source—to al-Bayhaqi in

وتعقبه الذهبي بقوله: " قلت: لم يخرجا لأبي عشانة ". قلت: واسمه حي بن يؤمن، وهو ثقة. قال السندي في حاشيته على النسائي. " قوله: " أهله الحلية " بكسر فسكون. الظاهر أنه يمنع أزواجه الحلية مطلقا سواء كان من ذهب أو فضة، ولعل ذلك مخصوص بهم، ليؤثروا الآخرة على الدنيا، وكذا الحرير، ويحتمل أن المراد بـ (الأهل) الرجال من أهل البيت، فالأمر واضح ". قلت: هذا الاحتمال بعيد غير متبادر فالاعتماد على ما ذكره أولا والله أعلم. وأقول: فهذا الحديث يدل على مثل ما دل عليه الحديث المشهور الذي سبق آنفا من إباحة الحرير لسائر النساء، إلا أنه قد يقال: إن الأولى بهن الرغبة عنه وعن الحلية مطلقا تشبيها بنسائه ﷺ، لاسيما وقد ثبت عنه أنه قال: " ويل للنساء من الأحمرين: الذهب والمعصفر ". ٣٣٩ - " ويل للنساء من الأحمرين: الذهب والمعصفر ". أخرجه ابن حبان (١٤٦٤) : أخبرنا الحسن بن سفيان حدثنا سريج بن يونس حدثنا عباد بن عباد عن محمد بن عمرو عن أبي سلمة عن أبي هريرة عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: فذكره. وأخرجه البيهقي في " شعب الإيمان " (٢ / ٢٣٠ / ٢ مصورة المكتب الإسلامي) من طريق أبي حاتم الرازي حدثنا سريج بن يونس به. قلت: وهذا إسناد جيد، رجاله كلهم ثقات رجال الشيخين غير الحسن بن سفيان وهو الفسوي ثقة حافظ مشهور. ومحمد بن عمرو هو ابن علقمة أخرج له البخاري مقرونا ومسلم ومتابعة. وأما قول المناوي في " فيض القدير " بعد أن عزاه تبعا لأصله إلى البيهقي في

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies