Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

I say: This is a good chain of transmission, Allah willing. Its narrators are trustworthy and are among those included in al-Tahdhib, except for Muslim ibn al-Walid ibn Rabah. Ibn Abi Hatim mentioned him and said:

“... A client of the family of Abu Dhibab, he narrated from al-Muttalib ibn ʿAbd Allah ibn Hantab. Al-Bukhari had listed this name under the entry ‘al-Walid ibn Muslim ibn Abi Rabah,’ but Abu Zurʿah said: ‘It is in fact Muslim ibn al-Walid.’ My father said the same.”

He did not mention any criticism or accreditation concerning him. In al-Bukhari’s al-Tarikh (4/2/153/2534), he appears as stated above, but with the names reversed. What is correct is what appears in al-Jarh, as the Yemeni editor, may Allah have mercy on him, decisively affirmed in his notes on al-Tarikh. Al-Hafiz al-Mizzi likewise listed him among those who narrated from al-Muttalib ibn ʿAbd Allah ibn Hantab in his Tahdhib al-Kamal.

Ibn Hibban also mentioned him briefly in al-Thiqat, saying (7/446):

“Muslim ibn al-Walid: he narrated from his father, from Abu Hurayrah; Ibn al-Had and al-Darawardi narrated from him.”

This contains an important benefit not mentioned in the two works: namely, that these two trustworthy men narrated from him—al-Darawardi, who is ʿAbd al-ʿAziz ibn Muhammad, the narrator of this hadith from him; and Ibn al-Had. Ibn Hibban included Ibn al-Had’s hadith from him in his Sahih (4158, al-Ihsan). I had previously included it in al-Irwa’ (7/64), before coming across this biographical notice in al-Thiqat; so let this benefit be taken and transferred there.

Al-Mundhiri, and then al-Haythami, did not come across it, and the grandfather’s name, Rabah, was corrupted for them into al-ʿAbbas. Thus al-Mundhiri said (2/184/4):

قلت: وهذا إسناد حسن إن شاء الله تعالى، رجاله ثقات من رجال "التهذيب "؛ غير مسلم بن الوليد بن رباح، أورده ابن أبي حاتم فقال: ".. مولى آل أبي ذباب، روى عن المطلب بن عبد الله بن حنطب. وكان البخاري أخرج هذا الاسم في باب (الوليد بن مسلم بن أبي رباح) ، فقال أبو زرعة: إنما هو (مسلم بن الوليد) . وكذا قاله أبي ". ولم يذكر فيه جرحاً ولا تعديلاً. وهو في "تاريخ البخاري " (٤/٢/١٥٣/٢٥٣٤) كما ذكر على القلب! والصواب ما في "الجرح " كما جزم المحقق اليماني ﵀ في تعليقه على "التاريخ "، وكذلك ذكره الحافظ المزي في الرواة عن (المطلب بن عبد الله بن حنطب) من كتابه "تهذيب الكمال ". وذكره كذلك ابن حبان في "الثقات " مختصراً؛ فقال (٧/٤٤٦) : "مسلم بن الوليد، يروي عن أبيه عن أبي هريرة، روى عنه ابن الهاد، والدراوردي ". وفيه فائدة هامة لم تذكر في (الكتابين) ، وهي رواية هذين الثقتين عنه: الدراوردي- وهو عبد العزيز بن محمد- الراوي لهذا الحديث عنه، وابن الهاد، وحديثه عنه أخرجه ابن حبان في "صحيحه " (٤١٥٨- الإحسان) ، وكنت أخرجته في "الإرواء" (٧/٦٤) قبل أن أقف على هذه الترجمة في "الثقات "؛ فلتُسْتفد، ولتنقل إلى هناك. ولم يقف عليها المنذري ثم الهيثمي، وتحرف عليهما اسم الجد (رباح) إلى: (العباس) ، فقال المنذري (٢/ ١٨٤/ ٤) :

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies