Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

al-Ashbal al-Zuhayri in his annotation on it. He cited several corroborating reports for it, declaring one of them authentic, from the hadith of Abu Jahm; it is documented in al-Rawd through the narration of Ahmad and others.

A point of benefit: Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr said after the hadith:

“The meaning is that two people dispute over a verse: one of them denies and rejects it, or comes to doubt it. That is the disputation which constitutes disbelief.

“As for disagreement over the rulings and meanings of the Quran, the Companions of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, differed over much of that. This makes clear to you that the disputation which constitutes disbelief is denial and doubt, as Allah, Exalted is He, says: ‘Those who disbelieve will not cease to be in doubt concerning it’ [al-Hajj 22:55]. Contentious disputation and quarrelling are both impermissible, and both are universally condemned. The early generations, may Allah have mercy on them, forbade disputation concerning Allah, mighty and majestic, with regard to His attributes and names.

“As for jurisprudence, they unanimously agreed upon debate and scholarly discussion concerning it, because it is a field of knowledge in which subsidiary matters must be referred back to foundational principles, due to the need for this. Beliefs are not so, for Allah, mighty and majestic, is described only as He has described Himself, as His Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, has described Him, or as the Muslim community has reached consensus concerning. There is nothing comparable to Him such that He could be apprehended by analogy or profound speculation. We have been forbidden to contemplate Allah and commanded to contemplate His creation, which points to Him (1).”

3448 — “Whoever learns archery and then abandons it is not one of us, or he has disobeyed.”

Recorded by Muslim (6/52), Abu ʿAwanah (5/102–103), al-Bayhaqi in al-Sunan (10/13), al-Ruwayani in his Musnad (1/163/195), and al-Tabarani in al-Muʿjam

(1) I say: This is a strong hadith when all its chains are considered together. I documented some of them in al-Sahihah (no. 1788), then found for it a mursal report with an authentic chain of transmission, which I added there.
الأشبال الزهيري في تعليقه عليه، فقد ذكر له عدة شواهد صحح أحدها من حديث أبي جهم، وهو مخرج في "الروض " من رواية أحمد وغيره. (فائدة) : قال ابن عبد البر عقب الحديث: "والمعنى: أن يتمارى اثنان في آية؛ يجحدها أحدهما ويدفعها، أو يصير فيها إلى الشك، فذلك هو المراء الذي هو الكفر. وأما التنازع في أحكام القرآن ومعانيه؛ فقد تنازع أصحاب رسول الله ﷺ في كثير من ذلك، وهذا يبين لك أن المراء الذي هو الكفر: هو الجحود والشك كما قال ﷿: ﴿ولا يزال الذين كفروا في مرية منه﴾ [الحج: ٥٥] ، والمراء والملاحاة غير جائز شيء منهما؛ وهما مذمومان بكل لسان، ونهى السلف ﵃ عن الجدال في الله جل ثناؤه في صفاته وأسمائه. وأما الفقه؛ فأجمعوا على الجدال فيه والتناظر؛ لأنه علم يحتاج فيه إلى رد الفروع على الأصول للحاجة إلى ذلك، وليس الاعتقادات كذلك؛ لأن الله ﷿ لا يوصف إلا بما وصف به نفسه أو وصفه به رسول الله ﷺ أو أجمعت عليه الأمة، وليس كمثله شيء فيدرك بقياس أو بإنعام نظر، وقد نهينا عن التفكر في الله، وأمرنا بالتفكر في خلقه الدال عليه (١) ". * ٣٤٤٨- (من علِم الرمي ثم تركه؛ فليسَ منّا، أو قد عصَى) . أخرجه مسلم (٦/٥٢) ، وأبو عوانة (٥/١٠٢-١٠٣) ، والبيهقي في "السنن " (١٠/١٣) ، والرُُّّوياني في "مسنده " (١/١٦٣/١٩٥) ، والطبراني في " المعجم
(١) قلت: وهو حديث قوي بمجموع طرقه، وقد خرجت بعضها في "الصحيحة" (رقم ١٧٨٨) ، ثم وجدت له مرسلاً صحيح الإسناد، فألحقته به.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies