Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani
  1. “What is lawful is clear, and what is forbidden is clear; between them are doubtful matters. Whoever falls into them is liable to sin, while whoever avoids them better safeguards his religion. This is like one who grazes his flock beside a protected reserve and is soon likely to stray into it. Every ruler has a protected reserve, and Allah’s protected reserve is what He has forbidden.”

Al-Ṭabarānī narrated it in al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr (10/404–405/1024), and Ibn ʿAsākir in Tārīkh Dimashq (7/1), through two routes from al-Walīd ibn Shujāʿ ibn al-Walīd, who said: “My father narrated to me: Sābiq al-Jazarī narrated to us that ʿAmr ibn Abī ʿAmr, the freedman of al-Muṭṭalib, informed him, from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn al-Ḥārith, from Ibn ʿAbbās, that the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said...” He then mentioned it.

I say: This is an authentic chain of transmission that is transmitted through at least two routes. All its narrators, apart from Sābiq al-Jazarī—who was Ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Raqqī—are trustworthy narrators of the Ṣaḥīḥ. Ibn Ḥibbān (6/433) declared him trustworthy and said:

“Al-Awzāʿī and the people of al-Jazīrah narrated from him.”

I say: Ibn ʿAsākir named a group of them in Tārīkh Dimashq (7/1), and most of them are trustworthy. He devoted a lengthy biographical notice to him over eight large pages, mentioning that he came to ʿUmar ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz and recited to him poems on asceticism; that he was the imam of the mosque in al-Raqqah and the judge of its people; and that he has a shorter biographical notice in Tārīkh al-Raqqah (pp. 123–127).

It seems that al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar did not come across his biographical notice in Ibn ʿAsākir’s history. Consequently, in his entry on the man in al-Lisān, he did not mention these benefits that we have derived from it. It becomes clear that he was known for virtue, asceticism, leadership in prayer, and judicial office, and that eminent, trustworthy men narrated from him. The original source for his biographical notice was likewise unknown to his teacher al-Haythamī, who said in his documentation of the hadith (10/294):

“Al-Ṭabarānī narrated it, and it includes Sābiq al-Jazarī, whom I do not know.”

The three annotators, who merely reproduce reports, followed him in their annotations on al-Targhīb (2/543), and

٣٣٦١- (الحلال بين، والحرام بين، وبين ذلك شبهات، فمن أوقع بهن؛ فهو قمن أن يأثم، ومن اجتنبهن؛ فهو أوفر لدينه، كمرتع إلى جنب حمى، أوشك يقع فيه، لكل ملك حمى، وحمى الله الحرام) . أخرجه الطبراني في "المعجم الكبير" (١٠/٤٠٤ـ ٤٠٥/١٠٢٤) ، وابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق " (٧/ ١) من طريقين عن الوليد بن شجاع بن الوليد: حدثني أبي: ثنا سابق الجزري أن عمرو بن أبي عمرو مولى المطلب أخبره عن عبد الرحمن ابن الحارث عن ابن عباس: أن رسول الله ﷺ قال: ... فذكره. قلت: وهذا إسناد عزيز صحيح، رجاله كلهم ثقات رجال "الصحيح "؛ غير سابق الجزري- وهو ابن عبد الله الرقي-، وثقه ابن حبان (٦/٤٣٣) ، وقال: "روى عنه الأ وزاعي وأهل الجزيرة". قلت: وقد سمى ابن عساكر في "تاريخ دمشق " (٧/ ١) طائفة منهم، وأكثرهم ثقات، وترجم له ترجمة طويلة في ثمان صفحات كبار، وذكر أنه قدم على عمر ابن عبد العزيز، وأنشده أشعاراً في الزهد، وأنه كان إمام مسجد الرقة، وقاضي أهلها؛ وله ترجمة مختصرة في "تاريخ الرقة " (ص ١٢٣- ١٢٧) . ويبدو أن الحافظ ابن حجر لم يقف على ترجمته في "تاريخ ابن عساكر"، فلم يذكر في ترجمة الرجل من "اللسان " هذه الفوائد التي استفدناها منه، وتبين أنه كان معروفاً بالفضل والزهد والإمامة والقضاء، وبرواية الثقات الفضلاء عنه. كما خفي أصل ترجمته على شيخه الهيثمي، فقال في تخريجه للحديث (١٠/٢٩٤) . "رواه الطبراني، وفيه (سابق الجزري) ، ولم أعرفه "! وقلده المعلقون الثلاثة النقلة في تعليقهم على "الترغيب " (٢/٥٤٣) ، ولا

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies