Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

al-Ahmar related to us: Shuʿbah related from Yazid ibn Khumayr, from Habib ibn ʿUbayd, from ʿAwf ibn Malik, who said: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: “...” Then he mentioned it.

I say: Al-Haythami also said—and the printed edition (4/119) has omitted his attribution of it to al-Tabarani:

“In its chain is al-Husayn ibn ʿAbd al-Awwal, and he is weak.”

I say: There is disagreement concerning him. In al-Mizan and al-Lisan, it states:

“Abu Zurʿah said: ‘I do not narrate from him.’ Abu Hatim said: ‘The people have spoken about him.’ Ibn Maʿin declared him a liar. Abu Zurʿah also said: ‘He narrated hadiths; I do not know what they are.’ Ibn Hibban listed him in al-Thiqat.” (8/187)

Then al-Hafiz mentioned a rejected hadith of his transmission, from Abu Muʿawiyah, from ʿUthman ibn Waqid, from Musa ibn Yasar, from Abu Hurayrah, who attributed it to the Prophet:

“Indeed, the seven heavens and the seven earths curse the elderly adulteress and the elderly adulterer.” (1)

I say: Assigning the blame for this hadith’s defect to al-Husayn ibn ʿAbd al-Awwal is no more warranted than assigning it to ʿUthman ibn Waqid, for he, too, is weak. Al-Dhahabi said in al-Mughni:

“He was declared trustworthy, but Abu Dawud deemed him weak.”

Moreover, even if we assume that Husayn is the hidden defect, this does not necessitate declaring him categorically weak, for no one is free of error, as is well known to the people of knowledge. Perhaps this hadith was the reason Ibn Maʿin accused him of lying; that may have resulted from the strictness for which he was known. I say this because I found attestations to this man’s reliability—which al-Hafiz did not mention—that have led me not to attach weight—

(1) It has also been narrated on the authority of Buraydah; it is cited in al-Da'ifah (no. 3011).
الأحمر: ثنا شعبة عن يزيد بن خُمَيْرِعن حبيب بن عبيد عن عوف بن مالك قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ: ... فذكره. قلت: وقال الهيثمي- وسقط من المطبوعة (٤/١١٩) عزوه للطبراني-: "وفيه الحسين بن عبد الأول، وهو ضعيف ". قلت: هو مختلف فيه، قال في "الميزان " و"اللسان ": "قال أبو زرعة: "لا أحدث عنه ". وقال أبو حاتم: "تكلم فيه الناس ". وكذبه ابن معين. وقال أبو زرعة أيضاً: "روى أحاديث؛ لا أدري ما هي؟ ". وذكره ابن حبان في (الثقات) ". (٨/١٨٧) . ثم ذكر له الحافظ حديثاً منكراً من روايته عن أبي معاوية عن عثمان بن واقد عن موسى بن يسار عن أبي هريرة رفعه: "إن السماوات السبع والأرضين السبع لتلعن العجوز الزانية والشيخ الزاني " (١) . قلت: وتعصيب جناية هذا الحديث بالحسين بن عبد الأول ليس بأولى من تعصيبها بعثمان بن واقد؛ فإن فيه ضعفاً؛ قال الذهبي في "المغني ": "وُثِّق، وضعفه أبو داود". ثم على فرض أن حسيناً هو العلة؛ فذلك لا يستلزم تضعيفه مطلقاً؛ لأن أحداً لا يخلو من الوهم، كما لا يخفى على أهل العلم، ولعل هذا الحديث هو السبب في رمي ابن معين إياه بالكذب، ويكون ذلك من تشدده الذي عرف به، أقول هذا لأنني رأيت من التوثيق لهذا الرجل- مما لم يذكره الحافظ- ما جعلني لا
(١) وقد روي من حديث بريدة، وهو مخرج في "الضعيفة" (٣٠١١) .

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies