And al-Bukhari also narrated it in al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr (1/1/408) through the route of al-Zubaydī, from al-Zuhrī, from Ayyūb ibn Bashīr al-Anṣārī, from ʿAbbād ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Zubayr, from ʿĀʾishah, from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him.

And Allah, Most High, knows best.

3305—(The first of the signs: the sun rising from the west).

Al-Ṭabarānī narrated it in al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr (8022); al-Khaṭīb in Tārīkh Baghdād (2/156 and 5/24); Ibn Ḥibbān in al-Majrūḥīn (2/204); Ibn ʿAdī in al-Kāmil (6/2047); and Ibn ʿAsākir in Tārīkh Dimashq (5/365), through the route of Ṭālūt ibn ʿAbbād, from Faḍḍāl ibn Jubayr, from Abū Umāmah, from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, who said: … and he mentioned it.

This is a weak chain of transmission. Faḍḍāl ibn Jubayr was graded weak by Abū Ḥātim al-Rāzī, as stated in al-Mīzān.

Ibn Ḥibbān said: “It is not permissible, under any circumstances, to cite him as evidence.”

Al-Haythamī said in al-Majmaʿ (8/9):

“Al-Ṭabarānī narrated it in al-Awsaṭ, and it contains Faḍālah ibn Jubayr; this hadith has been denounced!”

I say: As for its being in al-Awsaṭ, no; perhaps what al-Haythamī had is an error or a scribal corruption.

“Faḍālah” is a scribal corruption of the aforementioned Faḍḍāl.

His statement, “This hadith has been denounced,” perhaps indicates Ibn ʿAdī’s practice of including this hadith among the objectionable reports of this Faḍḍāl.