Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

And he said nothing about it, offering no comment whatsoever. Rather, he followed it with numerous reports containing various supplications against him—some of which I had cited in al-Da'ifah. He remained silent regarding all of them, while explicitly declaring some of them weak. He concluded them by citing the previously mentioned hadith of Aishah: “The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, cursed your father while you were still in his loins.” Yet, instead of explicitly declaring it authentic, he hinted that it was defective on the grounds that it conflicted with the previously cited narration of al-Bukhari. He said immediately afterward:

“I say: The basic account is found in al-Bukhari without this addition.”

I say: What value is there in this comment, when he knows that this addition has an authentic chain of transmission and comes through a route other than that of al-Bukhari?! Moreover, it is not alone in this, but has authentic corroborating reports as well, as mentioned above. I have confined myself to these rather than citing reports that might serve as supporting evidence. For, at the end of his commentary in al-Fath (13/11) on the hadith, “The destruction of my community will be at the hands of young men from Quraysh,” he said:

“Reports have been transmitted concerning the cursing of al-Hakam, Marwan’s father, and his offspring. Al-Tabarani and others transmitted them. Most of them are subject to criticism, though some are good. Perhaps what is intended is to identify the young men mentioned with them specifically.”

Still more astonishing than all this is the reservation expressed by al-Hafiz al-Dhahabi in his biography of al-Hakam in his Tarikh (2/96):

“Objectionable reports have been transmitted concerning his being cursed; it is not permissible to cite them as proof. In general, he possesses no particular distinction in Companionship, but only its general designation.”

That is what he said! Yet, only one page later, he cited al-Sha'bi’s report from Ibn al-Zubayr, declaring its chain of transmission authentic, as mentioned above! Such inconsistency—or contradiction—opens the way for followers of vain desires to take from it whatever suits their desires. We ask Allah for safety.

وسكت عليه ولم يتعقبه بشيء، بل إنه أتبعه بروايات كثيرة فيها أدعية مختلفة عليه، كنت ذكرت بعضها في "الضعيفة"، وسكت عنها كلها وصرح بضعف بعضها، وختمها بذكر حديث عائشة المتقدم: أن رسول الله ﷺ لعن أباك وأنت في صلبه. ولكنه- بديل أن يصرح بصحته- ألمح إلى إعلاله بمخالفته رواية البخاري المتقدمة، فقال عقبها: "قلت: وأصل القصة عند البخاري بدون هذه الزيادة"! فأقول: ما قيمة هذا التعقب، وهو يعلم أن هذه الزيادة صحيحة السند، وأنها من طريق غير طريق البخاري؟! وليس هذا فقط، بل ولها شواهد صحيحة أيضاً كما تقدم؟! اكتفيت بها عن ذكر ما قد يصلح للاستشهاد به! فقد قال في آخر شرحه لحديث: "هلكة أمتي على يدي غلمة من قريش " من "الفتح " (١٣/١١) : "وقد وردت أحاديث في لعن الحكم والد مروان وما ولد. أخرجها الطبراني وغيره؛ غالبها فيه مقال، وبعضها جيد، ولعل المراد تخصيص الغلمة المذكورين بذلك "! وأعجب من ذلك كلِّه تحفُّظُ الحافظ الذهبي بقوله في ترجمة (الحكم) من " تاريخه " (٢/ ٩٦) : "وقد وردت أحاديث منكرة في لعنه، لا يجوز الاحتجاج بها، وليس له في الجملة خصوص من الصحبة بل عمومها"! كذا قال! مع أنه- بعد صفحة واحدة- ساق رواية الشعبي عن ابن الزبير مصححاً إسناده كما تقدم!! ومثل هذا التلون أو التناقض مما يفسح المجال لأهل الأهواء أن يأخذوا منه ما يناسب أهواءهم! نسأل الله السلامة.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies