Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

(1) Reported by Ahmad and others; it is documented in al-Ṣaḥīḥah (1674) and al-Irwāʾ (1208).

ibn Yaʿqūb al-Rukhamī: Zayd ibn Yaḥyā ibn ʿUbayd al-Dimashqī narrated to us: Saʿīd ibn Bashīr narrated to us, from Qatādah, from Anas, who said: The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: ... and he cited it. He said:

“Singular among the narrations of Anas.”

I say: Its narrators are trustworthy, except for Saʿīd ibn Bashīr. Although he was a hadith memorizer, some scholars criticized him, while a number of hadith masters declared him trustworthy. This is contrary to the claim of one of the contemporary writers who are excessively strict toward women: he declared him very weak and gave readers the impression that no one had declared him trustworthy. The facts belie this, for among those who declared him trustworthy was the imam of imams, al-Bukhārī. Indeed, al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Dhahabī, in al-Kāshif, said no more about him—after describing him as a hadith memorizer, and adding in al-Siyar that he was truthful—than:

“Al-Bukhārī said: ‘They speak critically of his memory, but he is tolerable.’ Duḥaym said: ‘Trustworthy; our shaykhs used to declare him trustworthy.’”

I have refuted the one who disregarded these declarations of trustworthiness, as well as others like him among the excessively strict, in my new book, The Decisive Refutation of Those Who Oppose the Scholars, Are Excessively Strict, and Show Partisanship ... May Allah facilitate for me the preparation of its final copy and its publication, through His grace and generosity.

For this reason, when al-Haythamī, in al-Majmaʿ (10/65), attributed this hadith to al-Bazzār and related his declaration that it was singular, he followed it by saying:

“I say: It contains Saʿīd ibn Bashīr, concerning whom there is disagreement: some declared him trustworthy, while others declared him weak; the rest of its narrators are trustworthy.”

I say: A narrator of his standing occupies a middle rank, and his hadith is good in itself, or at the very least good on account of corroborating evidence. On this basis, I had strengthened his hadith: “When a woman reaches menstrual age, it is not permissible for any part of her to be seen except her face and hands.” See my book under its new title, The Muslim Woman’s Outer Garment.

(١) رواه احمد وغيره؛ وهو مخرج في " الصحيحة " (١٦٧٤) ، و" الإرواء" (١٢٠٨) . ابن يعقوب الرُّخامي: ثنا زيد بن يحيى بن عُبيد الدمشقي: ثنا سعيد بن بشير عن قتادة عن أنس قال: قال النبي ﷺ: ... فذكره. وقال: "غريب من حديث أنس ". قلت: ورجاله ثقات؛ إلا أن سعيد بن بشير- مع حفظه- قد تكلم بعضهم فيه، وقد وثقه جمع من الحفاظ؛ خلافاً لمن زعم- من الكتاب المعاصرين المتشددين على المرأة- أنه ضعيف جداً، وأوهم القراء أنه لا موثق له، والواقع يكذبه، ومنهم إمام الأئمة البخاري، حتى إن الحافظ الذهبي في "الكاشف " لم يزد على قوله فيه- بعد وصفه إياه بـ (الحافظ) ؛ وزاد في "السير" (الصدوق) -: "قال (خ) : يتكلمون في حفظه، وهو محتمل. وقال دُحيم: ثقة، كان مشيختنا يوثقونه ". وقد رددت على المتجاهل للتوثيق، وعلى أمثاله من المتشددين في كتابي الجديد: "الرد المفحم على من خالف العلماء وتشدد وتعصب ... " يسر الله لي تبييضه ونشره بمنه وكرمه. ولهذا؛ لما عزا هذا الحديث الهيثميُّ في "المجمع " (١٠/٦٥) للبزار وحكى استغرابه إياه؛ عقّب عليه بقوله: "قلت: فيه سعيد بن بشير، وقد اختلف فيه، فوثقه قوم، وضعفه آخرون، وبقية رجاله ثقات". قلت: فمثله وسط حسن الحديث لذاته، أو لغيره على الأقل، وعلى هذا كنت جريت في تقوية حديثه: "إذا بلغت المرأة المحيض لم يصلح أن يرى منها إلا وجهها وكفاها"؛ فراجع كتابي بعنوانه الجديد: "جلباب المرأة المسلمة ".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies