It was recorded by al-Bukhari in al-Adab al-Mufrad (237), Ahmad (1/114), Abu Ya'la (1/409/279), and, through the latter, al-Diya al-Maqdisi in al-Ahadith al-Mukhtarah (Musnad of Ali). It was also recorded by Ibn Sa'd and Ibn Abi Shaybah (no. 12882), all of them through Muhammad ibn al-Fudayl with the same chain.

Jarir also corroborated him, narrating from al-Mughirah with the same chain.

It was recorded by Abu Ya'la (no. 334), al-Tabarani (6/185), and, through him, al-Diya as well. Al-Haythami said in al-Majma' (9/288–289):

“It was narrated by Ahmad, Abu Ya'la, and al-Tabarani. Their narrators are the narrators of the two Sahihs, apart from Umm Musa, who is trustworthy.”

I say: Her biographical notice in al-Tahdhib reads as follows:

“Umm Musa, the concubine of Ali ibn Abi Talib. It is said that her name was Fakhitah, and it is also said that it was Habibah. She narrated from Ali ibn Abi Talib and Umm Salamah, and al-Mughirah ibn Miqsam al-Dabbi narrated from her. Al-Daraqutni said: ‘Her hadith is sound, and her reports may be cited as corroborative evidence.’

I say: Al-'Ijli said: ‘A trustworthy female Successor from Kufah.’”

Al-Mughirah ibn Miqsam was trustworthy and among the narrators of the two Sahihs, but he practised concealment in transmission and did not explicitly state that he heard from Umm Musa in any of the sources that recorded the hadith. Thus, some annotators’ grading of its chain as good is not sound—unless they mean that it is good on the strength of what precedes it; in that case, yes.

I also failed to mention that al-Haythami cited the hadith through the first route from Ibn Mas'ud, mentioned some of the wording found in the other routes, and said: