Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Ibn al-‘Arabi went too far in The Rulings of the Quran (3/1574–1575), explicitly declaring al-Zuhri’s narration to be weak.

As for al-Hafiz, he reconciled the two narrations by understanding Ibn Shihab’s narration to mean that ‘Umar initially wanted their faces to be covered. Then, when the command came down in accordance with what he had wanted, he wished, as an added measure of concealment, that their persons also be screened from view. But this was not granted because of necessity—that is, as stated in Hisham’s narration. He then said:

“Accordingly, they observed concealment in different ways when relieving themselves:

First, by means of darkness, for they would go out at night rather than during the day, as Aishah said in al-Zuhri’s hadith: ‘They would go out at night.’ It will also appear in Aishah’s hadith concerning ‘the story of the slander’: ‘Umm Mistah and I went out toward al-Manasi‘, which was where we relieved ourselves, and we would go out only at night, night after night.’

Then the veil was prescribed, and they covered themselves with clothing; yet their figures could sometimes still be recognized. This is why ‘Umar said to Sawdah on the second occasion, after the veil had been prescribed: ‘By Allah, you cannot conceal yourselves from us.’

Then private enclosures were made in the houses, and they concealed themselves within them, as is also mentioned in Aishah’s hadith concerning ‘the story of the slander,’ which states: ‘That was before private enclosures had been made.’ The story of the slander took place after the verse of veiling had been revealed.”

I say: In al-Hafiz’s statement concerning ‘Umar—“But this was not granted because of necessity”—there is a refutation of those, past and present, who claim that it was prohibited for the Mothers of the Believers to let their persons be seen, even if they were wearing face veils and fully wrapped in garments. Al-Hafiz attributed this claim to Qadi ‘Iyad and said (8/530–531):

“Then he cited as evidence what is found in al-Muwatta: when ‘Umar died, the women screened Hafsah so that her person would not be seen; and Zaynab bint Jahsh had a canopy placed over her bier to conceal her person.”

وبالغ ابن العربي في "أحكام القرآن " (٣/ ١٥٧٤- ١٥٧٥) ، فصرح بضعف رواية الزهري وأما الحافظ فجمع بين الروايتين، بأن حمل رواية ابن شهاب على أن عمر أراد أولاً الأمر بستر وجوههن، فلما وقع الأمر بوفق ما أراد؛ أحب أن يحجب أشخاصهن مبالغة في التستر؛ فلم يجب لأجل الضرورة، يعني كما في رواية هشام؛ ثم قال: "وعلى هذا؛ فقد كان لهن في التستر عند قضاء الحاجات حالات: أولها: بالظلمة؛ لأنهن كن يخرجن بالليل دون النهار، كما قالت عائشة في حديث الزهري: "كن يخرجن بالليل "، وسيأتي في حديث عائشة في "قصة الإفك ": "فخرجت معي أم مسطح قِبل المناصع وهو مُتَبَرَّزُنا، وكنا لا نخرج إلا ليلاً إلى ليل ". ثم نزل الحجاب فتسترن بالثياب، لكن كانت أشخاصهن ربما تتميز، ولهذا قال عمر لسودة في المرة الثانية بعد نزول (الحجاب) : "أما والله ما تخفين علينا". ثم اتخذت الكُنُف في البيوت فتسترن بها كما في حديث عائشة في "قصة الإفك " أيضاً؛ فإن فيها: "وذلك قبل أن تتخذ الكُنُف "، وكان "قصة الإفك " بعد نزول آية الحجاب ". قلت: وفي قول الحافظ عن عمر: "فلم يجب؛ لأجل الضرورة" رد على من يزعم قديماً وحديثاً أن أمهات المؤمنين كان يَحْرُمُ عليهن إبراز أشخاصهن، ولو كن منتقبات متلفعات، وعزا الحافظ هذا الزعم للقاضي عياض، وقال (٨/٥٣٠- ٥٣١) : "ثم استدل بما في "الموطأ": أن حفصة لما توفي عمر سترها النساء عن أن يرى شخصها، وأن زينب بنت جحش جعلت لها القبة فوق نعشها ليستر شخصها".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies