Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

I say: A narrator such as him may have his hadith graded sound, but not authentic. Ibn ‘Adi said of him (6/30):

“He narrated sound reports and uncommon ones. Al-Bukhari relied on him in his Sahih and narrated many reports from him. In my view, there is no harm in him.”

Al-Hafiz mentioned two corroborating reports for it, one from Abu Umamah and the other from Abu Hurayrah. I had previously documented them: the first under no. 2043, and the other under the hadith of Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri, no. 2044. Its wording is more complete, and it is a strong corroborating report for Fulayh’s hadith. Al-Hafiz should therefore have mentioned it, but apparently it did not come to mind, since Ibn Hibban was alone in narrating it. There, I had judged its chain authentic according to al-Bukhari’s criteria, based on the chain cited by al-Haythami in Mawarid al-Zam’an, which includes Khalifah ibn Khayyat, one of al-Bukhari’s narrators. It then became clear to me that this was an error—I do not know whether it was al-Haythami’s or the copyist’s—and that the correct name is Khalaf ibn Khalifah. Although he was truthful and one of Muslim’s narrators, he became confused in his later years; and I was unable to determine whether he narrated this before that confusion. Thus, his hadith is a good corroborating report for the hadith under discussion. And Allah knows best.

The referenced hadith of Abu Hurayrah is an abbreviated version, with the wording:

“You shall indeed enter Paradise, except whoever refuses and flees from Allah as a camel flees.”

I had attributed it there to al-Hakim alone, and I challenged his grading of it as authentic according to the criteria of the two Shaykhs, since its chain includes Isma‘il ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Abi Uways. Then I saw that al-Hafiz attributed it in Fath al-Bari (13/254) to both Ahmad and al-Hakim, and al-Hafiz said:

“Its chain meets the criteria of the two Shaykhs.”

The annotator of al-Ihsan (1/197) followed him in this judgment and in attributing it to both of them. What drew my attention was that, although he mentioned where al-Hakim had recorded it, he left a blank for Ahmad, without specifying its location.

قلت: فمثله قد يحسَّن حديثه، أما الصحة فلا، وقال ابن عدي فيه (٦/٣٠) : "روى أحاديث مستقيمة وغرائب، وقد اعتمده البخاري في "صحيحه "، وروى عنه الكثير، وهو عندي لا بأس به ". وقد ذكر له الحافظ شاهدين من حديث أبي أمامة وأبي هريرة، وقد كنت خرجتهما فيما تقدم، الأول برقم (٢٠٤٣) ، والآخر تحت حديث أبي سعيد الخدري برقم (٢٠٤٤) ، ولفظه أتم، وهو شاهد قوي لحديث فليح، فكان على الحافظ أن يذكره، فالظاهر أنه لم يستحضره؛ لأنه تفرد به ابن حبان. وكنت صححت إسناده ثمة على شرط البخاري، بناء على إسناده الذي ساقه الهيثمي في "موارد الظمآن "، وفيه: "خليفة بن خياط "، وهو من رجال البخاري. ثم تبينت أنه خطأ- لا أدري أمن الهيثمي هو أم الناسخ؟ -، وأن الصواب: "خلف بن خليفة"! وهذا وإن كان صدوقاً ومن رجال مسلم؛ فإنه كان اختلط، ولم يتبين لي أنه حدث به قبل الاختلاط، فحديثه شاهد جيد لحديث الترجمة. والله أعلم. وحديث أبي هريرة المشار إليه هو مختصر بلفظ: "لتدخلن الجنة إلا من أبى، وشرد على الله كشِراد البعير". وقد كنت عزوته هناك للحاكم وحده، وتعقبت تصحيحه إياه على شرط الشيخين بأن فيه إسماعيل بن عبد الله بن أبي أويس.. ثم رأيت الحافظ قد عزاه في "الفتح " (١٣/٢٥٤) لأحمد والحاكم معاً، وقال الحافظ: "وسنده على شرط الشيخين ". وقلده المعلق على "الإحسان " (١/١٩٧) في هذا وفي العزو إليهما معاً، وقد لفت نظري أنه مع ذكره موضع إخراج الحاكم إياه؛ بيَّض لأحمد فلم يعين موضعه

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies