Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

“I asked my father, may Allah have mercy on him, about deliberately abandoning the prayer. He said:

‘As for one who abandons it and does not perform it, or who performs it outside its prescribed time, I summon him three times. If he prays, [well and good]; otherwise, I execute him. In my view, he is in the position of an apostate.’”

I say: This is an explicit statement from Imam Ahmad that he did not declare him a disbeliever merely for abandoning the prayer, but rather for refusing to pray while knowing that he would be killed if he did not pray. The reason, then, is that he preferred being killed to praying; this is what indicates that his disbelief is doctrinal disbelief, and thus he became liable to execution.

Similar to this is what Majd Ibn Taymiyyah—the grandfather of Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah—mentioned in his book al-Muharrar fi al-Fiqh al-Hanbali (p. 62):

“Whoever delays a prayer out of laziness, rather than out of denial, is commanded to perform it. If he persists until the time for the next prayer is nearly over, he must be executed.”

I say: Thus, he did not declare him a disbeliever because of the delay, but because of persistence that indicates denial. For this reason, Imam Abu Ja‘far al-Tahawi, may Allah have mercy on him, said in Mushkil al-Athar, in a chapter he devoted to this issue—where he cited some of the proofs advanced by both sides, then chose the view that such a person is not a disbeliever—(4/228):

“The proof of this is that we command him to pray, whereas we do not command a disbeliever to pray. Had he become a disbeliever through what he did, we would have commanded him to embrace Islam; then, once he had embraced Islam, we would have commanded him to pray. Our not doing so, and our commanding him to pray, indicates that he remains among the people of prayer. Another proof is that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, commanded the man who deliberately broke his fast one day in Ramadan to offer the expiation he prescribed for him, which includes fasting; and fasting is only valid from Muslims. Since a man is a Muslim when he professes Islam, before carrying out what Islam requires of him in terms of the five daily prayers and the fast of Ramadan, the same applies here: he becomes a disbeliever by denying those obligations, but does not become a disbeliever by abandoning them without denying them; nor can he be

" سألت أبي ﵀ عن ترك الصلاة متعمداً؟ قال: والذي يتركها لا يصليها، والذي يصليها في غير وقتها؛ أدعوه ثلاثاً؛ فإن صلى وإلا ضربت عنقه، هو عندي بمنزلة المرتد.. ". قلت: فهذا نص من الإمام أحمد بأنه لم يكفر بمجرد تركه للصلاة، وإنما بامتناعه من الصلاة مع علمه بأنه سيقتل إن لم يصل، فالسبب هو إيثاره القتل على الصلاة، فهو الذي دل على أن كفره كفر اعتقادي، فاستحق القتل. ونحوه ما ذكره المجد ابن تيمية- جد شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية- في كتابه " المحرر في الفقه الحنبلي " (ص ٦٢) : " ومن أخر صلاة تكاسلاً لا جحوداً أمر بها؛ فإن أصر حتى ضاق وقت الأخرى؛ وجب قتله ". قلت: فلم يكفر بالتأخير، وإنما بالإصرار المنبئ عن الجحود. ولذلك قال الإمام أبو جعفر الطحاوي ﵀ في "مشكل الآثار" في باب عقده في هذه المسألة، وحكى شيئاً من أدلة الفريقين، ثم اختار أنه لا يكفر؛ قال (٤/٢٢٨) : " والدليل على ذلك أنا نأمره أن يصلي، ولا نأمر كافراً أن يصلي، ولو كان بما كان منه كافراً لأمرناه بالإسلام؛ فإذا أسلم أمرناه بالصلاة؛ وفي تركنا لذلك وأمرنا إياه بالصلاة؛ ماقد دل على أنه من أهل الصلاة؛ ومن ذلك أمر النبي ﷺ الذي أفطر في رمضان يوماً متعمداً بالكفارة التي أمره بها وفيها الصيام؛ لايكون الصيام إلا من المسلمين. ولما كان الرجل يكون مسلماً إذا أقر بالإسلام قبل أن يأتي بما يوجبه الإسلام من الصلوات الخمس؛ ومن صيام رمضان كان كذلك؛ ويكون كافراً بجحوده لذلك؛ ولا يكون كافراً بتركه إياه بغير جحود منه له؛ ولا يكون

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies