Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

rather, it has the same standing as Prophetic hadiths and sacred hadiths: mass transmission is not a condition for them, although some of them are mass-transmitted, as is this one, which has been narrated by five Companions or more, as noted above.

The person referred to then said: “The term nurā in the hadith—with the letter nūn bearing a ḍammah—means ‘we suppose,’ and supposition is the opposite of certainty. It may, however, convey certainty when supported by a contextual indication, but no such indication exists here.” I say: This rests upon the condition he stipulated concerning abrogated recitation, and it is invalid, as you have already learned; and whatever is built upon what is invalid is itself invalid.

From the foregoing, you may also understand that his attempt to support his view with what he cited from al-Hafiz—namely, al-Hafiz’s explanation of their aforementioned supposition—does not benefit him in the least. Al-Hafiz mentioned it only among several possible explanations for some hadiths and did not rely upon it. Rather, he relied on the other explanation previously cited from him and ruled decisively on it, saying: “It is certainly among that whose recitation was abrogated, even though its ruling remains in force.” He supported this with the hadith of Abu Musa and the hadith of Jabir. I do not know how the person referred to could have overlooked this—especially when there are also the other hadiths mentioned earlier, which instil certainty that the text was Quran and that its recitation was subsequently abrogated. I think that he was unaware of them; had he known of them, he would not have said what he said. Otherwise, his statement indicates a sorry state indeed. We ask Allah for safety.

This discussion led me to trace the hadith, “If an elderly man and an elderly woman commit adultery, stone them without fail,” for it is among the best-known cases of abrogated recitation according to the scholars. I shall follow it with what al-Hafiz related from the Companions concerning abrogated recitation, so that the person referred to, and other hadith chain-tracers, may know that knowledge and understanding of the Quran and the sunnah are one thing, whereas the craft of tracing hadiths is another. Allah is the One Whose help is sought.

بل حكمه حكم الأحاديث النبوية والأحاديث القدسية، فإنه لا يشترط فيها التواتر، وإن كان فيها ما هو متواتر، كهذا، فإنه رواه خمسة من الأصحاب أو أكثر كما سبق. ثم قال المومى إليه: " و " نرى "، في الحديث - بضم النون - معناها نظن، والظن عكس اليقين ، وقد يكون إياه بقرينة، وليست موجودة هنا ". فأقول: هذا مبني على الشرط الذي ذكره في منسوخ التلاوة، وهو باطل كما عرفت، وما بني على باطل فهو باطل . ومما سلف تعلم أن تأييده ما ذهب إليه بما نقله عن الحافظ من توجيهه لظنهم المذكور - لا يفيده شيئا، لأن الحافظ ذكره في جملة ما ذكره من الاحتمالات في توجيه بعض الأحاديث، ولم يعتمد عليه، بل اعتمد على الآخر الذي سبق نقله عنه ، وحط عليه بقوله: " فهو مما نسخت تلاوته جزما، وإن كان حكمه مستمرا ". وأيده بحديث أبي موسى، وحديث جابر، فلا أدري كيف تجاهله هذا المومى إليه، فكيف وهناك الأحاديث الأخرى المتقدمة التي تلقي اليقين في النفس أن الحديث كان من القرآن ثم نسخت تلاوته، وفي ظني أنه لم يعلم بها، وإنه لو علم بها ما قال ما قال، وإلا دل قوله على سوء الحال. نسأل الله السلامة. وهذا البحث مما ساقني إلى تخريج حديث " الشيخ والشيخة إذا زنيا "، لأنه من مشاهير منسوخ التلاوة عند العلماء، وأتبع ذلك بما ذكره الحافظ عن الصحابة في منسوخ التلاوة ، ليعلم المومى إليه وغيره من المخرجين أن العلم والفقه في الكتاب والسنة شيء، ومهنة تخريج الأحاديث شيء آخر. والله المستعان.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies