Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

“Al-Tabarani narrated it from his shaykh Abu Yahya al-Razi, whom I have not identified; the rest of its narrators are trustworthy.” Al-Manawi endorsed this in al-Jamiʿ al-Azhar.

That is what he said, but there are several points to note. First: Abu Yahya al-Razi was ʿAbd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Salm al-Razi, as stated by al-Dhahabi in al-Muqtanā fī al-Kunā. Al-Tabarani narrated one hadith from him in al-Muʿjam al-Saghir (1197), giving both his name and his kunya, though he attributed him to his grandfather and did not mention his father. He likewise mentioned him without the kunya in al-Muʿjam al-Awsat, where he related twenty-six hadiths from him (4864–4890, according to my numbering). One of them (4874) is narrated by him from Mahmud ibn Ghaylan, his shaykh in the hadith under discussion. Abu al-Shaykh included his biographical entry in Tabaqat al-Asbahaniyyin (339/459), naming his father and grandfather and giving his kunya; Abu Nuʿaym did likewise in Akhbar Isfahan (2/112), as did al-Dhahabi in Tadhkirat al-Huffaz. Al-Dhahabi said: “He was among the trustworthy narrators, and he died in 291 AH.”

Second: Muʾammal was Ibn Ismaʿil al-Basri, a resident of Mecca. Scholars differed concerning him, and more than one of the early authorities described him as frequently erring despite his truthfulness. This is the view favoured by al-Dhahabi in al-Kashif. Al-Hafiz said in al-Taqrib: “Truthful, but poor in retention.” Thus, including someone like him among the trustworthy narrators is plainly an instance of laxity.

Third: Abu Ishaq—al-Sabiʿi—practised concealment in transmission, and he reported it here using the ambiguous formula “from.” Nevertheless, the hadith is authentic, for it has a strong corroborating report from Abu Hurayrah, traced back to the Prophet, with the same wording, except that it states: “For Allah, Most High, is her Provider.”

" رواه الطبراني عن شيخه أبي يحيى الرازي ولم أعرفه وبقية رجاله ثقات ". وأقره المناوي في " الجامع الأزهر " ! كذا قال، وفيه أمور: أولا: أبو يحيى الرازي هو عبد الرحمن بن محمد بن سلم الرازي كما في " المقتنى في الكنى " للذهبي، وقد روى له الطبراني حديثا واحدا في " المعجم الصغير " (١١٩٧) باسمه وكنيته، لكنه نسبه إلى جده لم يذكر أباه وكذلك ذكره دون الكنية في " المعجم الأوسط "، وساق له ستة وعشرين حديثا ( ٤٨٦٤ - ٤٨٩٠ - بترقيمي) أحدها (٤٨٧٤) من روايته عن محمود بن غيلان شيخه في حديث الترجمة، وقد ترجمه أبو الشيخ في " طبقات الأصبهانيين " (٣٣٩ / ٤٥٩) منسوبا إلى أبيه وجده وبكنيته، وكذلك أبو نعيم في " أخبار أصبهان " (٢ / ١١٢) والذهبي في " تذكرة الحفاظ " وقال: " وكان من الثقات، توفي سنة إحدى وتسعين ومائتين ". ثانيا: مؤمل هو ابن إسماعيل البصري نزيل مكة، مختلف فيه وقد وصفه غير واحد من المتقدمين بأنه كثير الخطأ مع الصدق، وإليه جنح الذهبي في " الكاشف "، وقال الحافظ في " التقريب ": " صدوق، سيىء الحفظ ". فحشر مثله في زمرة الثقات لا يخفى ما فيه من التساهل. ثالثا: أبو إسحاق - وهو السبيعي - كان يدلس، وقد عنعنه. لكن الحديث صحيح فإن له شاهدا قويا من حديث أبي هريرة مرفوعا به إلا أنه قال: " فإن الله ﷿ رازقها ".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies