Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

This Muhammad ibn Yazid was Abu Hashim al-Rifaʿi, who was deemed weak by al-Bukhari and others.

As for the chain of transmission, ʿAli ibn al-Madini differed from them, saying: “Muhammad ibn Fudayl narrated to us: al-Aʿmash narrated to us from Habib ibn Abi Thabit, from Saʿid ibn ʿAbd al-Rahman, with this report attributed to the Prophet.” Thus, he did not mention Dharr in its chain of transmission. Al-Tahawi recorded it in Mushkil al-Athar (1/398). Ibn al-Madini was a trustworthy, exceptionally precise authority and one of al-Bukhari’s teachers. It therefore appears that Ibn Abi Thabit was the one who omitted Dharr and concealed this in transmission, as demonstrated by Shuʿbah’s forthcoming narration. It was also narrated with such concealment by someone other than Ibn Fudayl: Ibn Abi Shaybah recorded in al-Musannaf (10/217): “Asbat narrated to us from al-Aʿmash, from Habib ibn Abi Thabit, from Saʿid, with this report,” except that he stopped it at Ubayy and did not attribute it to the Prophet. Al-Bukhari likewise narrated it in al-Adab al-Mufrad (no. 719) from Ibn Abi Shaybah.

However, he was contradicted in stopping it at Ubayy. ʿAbd Allah ibn Ahmad said in his Zawaʾid (5/123): “Abu Musa Muhammad ibn al-Muthanna narrated to me: Asbat ibn Muhammad al-Qurashi narrated to us with this report,” except that he attributed it to the Prophet, saying: “The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said,” and then cited it. Al-Nasaʾi likewise narrated it through this chain (520/933). Asbat was trustworthy and among the narrators used by both al-Bukhari and Muslim. Thus, the chain would be authentic both as a report attributed to the Prophet and as one attributed to a Companion, were it not for Ibn Abi Thabit’s concealment in transmission and his omission of Dharr.

Yet Jarir did affirm Dharr, saying: “From al-Aʿmash, from Habib, from Dharr, from Saʿid,” with this report; however, he did not attribute it to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, but stopped it at Ubayy. Al-Nasaʾi recorded it (521/936), and al-Tahawi narrated it through him.

In sum, the narrators differed concerning this report of al-Aʿmash from Habib: some attributed it to the Prophet, while others stopped it at a Companion; some mentioned Dharr in it, while others did not. Yet whoever considers our documentation here will see that most of them attributed it to the Prophet and mentioned Dharr,

ومحمد بن يزيد هذا هو أبو هشام الرفاعي، وهو ضعيف عند البخاري وغيره. وأما الإسناد، فقد خالفهم علي بن المديني فقال: حدثنا محمد بن فضيل: حدثنا الأعمش عن حبيب بن أبي ثابت عن سعيد بن عبد الرحمن به مرفوعا. فلم يذكر في إسناده (ذرا) . أخرجه الطحاوي في " مشكل الآثار " (١ / ٣٩٨) . وابن المديني ثقة ثبت من شيوخ البخاري، فالظاهر أن ابن أبي ثابت هو الذي أسقط (ذرا ) ودلسه، بدليل رواية شعبة الآتية، وقد رواه غير ابن فضيل مدلسا، فقال ابن أبي شيبة في " المصنف " (١٠ / ٢١٧) : حدثنا أسباط عن الأعمش عن حبيب ابن أبي ثابت عن سعيد به إلا أنه أوقفه على أبي ولم يرفعه. وكذلك رواه البخاري في " الأدب المفرد " (رقم ٧١٩) عن ابن أبي شيبة. وقد خولف في وقفه، فقال عبد الله بن أحمد في " زوائده " (٥ / ١٢٣) : حدثني أبو موسى محمد بن المثنى: حدثنا أسباط بن محمد القرشي به إلا أنه رفعه فقال: عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: فذكره. وبهذا الإسناد رواه النسائي أيضا (٥٢٠ / ٩٣٣) . وأسباط ثقة من رجال الشيخين، فالسند صحيح مرفوعا وموقوفا لولا تدليس ابن أبي ثابت وإسقاطه لذر. لكن قد أثبته جرير فقال: عن الأعمش عن حبيب عن ذر عن سعيد به، إلا أنه لم يرفعه إلى النبي ﷺ، ووقفه على أبي. أخرجه النسائي (٥٢١ / ٩٣٦) ومن طريقه الطحاوي. وجملة القول أنه قد اختلف الرواة في حديث الأعمش هذا عن حبيب، فمنهم من رفعه، ومنهم من أوقفه، ومنهم من ذكر فيه (ذرا) ، ومنهم من لم يذكره. ولكن من تأمل في تخريجنا هذا تبين له أن أكثرهم رفعه وذكر (ذرا) ،

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies