Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

that it concerns moral soundness and corruption. He had no answer to this except to say: “Had he meant that, he would have said, ‘Indeed, within the human being …,’ rather than ‘the body’!” I said: “That does not follow, for the two expressions have one meaning, and the scholars have explained them as such. We must therefore refer back to them, not to physicians!” At that time, I was unaware of the wording he had rejected, so, as soon as I came across it, I hastened to trace its sources, perhaps this would help him and others like him return to what is correct. Allah is the Guide.

Our discussion then led us to speak about the heart and the fact that it is the seat of reason and understanding. He rejected this, claiming that reason is in the brain and that the heart has no function other than pumping blood to the body’s extremities. I said: “How can you say this when Allah says concerning the disbelievers: ‘They have hearts with which they do not understand,’ and says: ‘Have they not travelled through the land, so that they may have hearts with which to reason, or ears with which to hear? For it is not the eyes that become blind, but the hearts within the breasts that become blind’?”

He then attempted to give this a figurative reinterpretation, in the manner of certain deviant sects that negate the implications of the revealed texts. I said to him: “Doctor, this is Qarmatian-style esoteric reinterpretation, and it is impermissible. Our Lord says, ‘the hearts within the breasts,’ not within the heads!”

I now say: Among the benefits of the hadith is what al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in Fath al-Bari (1/128–129): “It draws attention to the immense importance of the heart and urges that it be made sound. It also indicates that wholesome earnings affect it; what is meant is the faculty of understanding connected to it, which Allah has placed within it. It is cited as evidence that reason is in the heart. Among the proofs for this are Allah’s saying, ‘so that they may have hearts with which to reason,’ and His saying, ‘Surely in that is a reminder for whoever has a heart.’ The exegetes said: that is, an intellect. It was expressed as ‘heart’ because it is the place where the intellect resides.”

Moreover, the addition rejected by the physician mentioned above is supported by many verses in

أنه في الصلاح والفساد المعنويين. فلم يجب عن ذلك بشيء سوى أنه قال: لو أراد ذلك لقال: " ألا وإن في الإنسان.. " مكان " الجسد "! قلت: هذا غير لازم، فإنهما بمعنى واحد، وبذلك فسره العلماء، فيجب الرجوع إليهم، وليس إلى الأطباء! ولم أكن مطلعا يومئذ على هذا اللفظ الذي أنكره، فبادرت إلى تخريجه بعيد وقوفي عليه ، لعل في ذلك ما يساعده وأمثاله على الرجوع إلى الصواب. والله الهادي. وقد جرنا الحديث إلى التحدث عن القلب وأنه مقر العقل والفهم، فأنكر ذلك، وادعى أن العقل في الدماغ، وأن القلب ليس له عمل سوى دفع الدم إلى أطراف البدن. قلت: كيف تقول هذا وقد قال الله تعالى في الكفار: * (لهم قلوب لا يفقهون بها ) *، وقال: * (أفلم يسيروا في الأرض فتكون لهم قلوب يعقلون بها أو آذان يسمعون بها فإنها لا تعمى الأبصار ولكن تعمى القلوب التي في الصدور) *؟! فحاول تأويل ذلك على طريقة بعض الفرق الضالة في تعطيل دلالات النصوص، وقلت له : هذه يا دكتور قرمطة لا تجوز، ربنا يقول: * (القلوب التي في الصدور) * لا في الرؤوس! وأقول الآن: من فوائد الحديث قول الحافظ ابن حجر في " فتح الباري " (١ / ١٢٨ - ١٢٩) : " وفيه تنبيه على تعظيم قدر القلب والحث على صلاحه، والإشارة إلى أن لطيب الكسب أثرا فيه، والمراد المتعلق به من الفهم الذي ركبه الله فيه. ويستدل به على أن العقل في القلب. ومنه قوله تعالى: * (فتكون لهم قلوب يعقلون بها) *، وقوله تعالى: * (إن في ذلك لذكرى لمن كان له قلب) * . قال المفسرون: أي عقل، وعبر عنه بالقلب لأنه محل استقراره ". ثم إن تلك الزيادة التي أنكرها الطبيب المشار إليه يشهد لها آيات كثيرة في

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies