Ibn Jud'an; whereas this is from Muhammad, as you see in Musnad Ahmad and as is stated in the biographical entries on these three men.

Moreover, calling Ahmad’s chain good is open to question, in view of what we have mentioned concerning Ibn Jud'an’s condition—unless what is meant is that it is good on account of supporting evidence; in that case, yes. For it was corroborated by al-Bazzar and others. In his Musnad (no. 1908), Kashf al-Astar, he said: “Muhammad ibn Kathir, the maternal grandson of Yazid ibn Harun, narrated to us: Surur ibn al-Mughirah, Abu Amir al-Wasiti, narrated to us: Sulayman al-Taymi narrated to us, from Muhammad ibn al-Munkadir, from Jabir ibn Abd Allah, from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. And Amr ibn Ali narrated to us: Hatim ibn Wardan narrated to us: Ali ibn Zayd narrated to us, from Muhammad ibn al-Munkadir, from Jabir, with the same report.” Al-Bazzar said: “We know of no one who narrated it in this manner except Sulayman and Ali ibn Yazid, and we heard it only from Muhammad, from Surur.”

I say: By the first chain, Bahshal also recorded it in History of Wasit (p. 92): “Muhammad ibn Kathir ibn Nafi al-Thaqafi, the maternal grandson of Yazid ibn Harun, narrated to us; he said: Surur ibn al-Mughirah narrated to us,” with the same report. He cited it in the biographical entry of this Surur, calling him Abu Amir, but did not mention any narrator criticism or accreditation concerning him, as was his habit.

Ibn Sad said in The Classes (7/315): “He used to transmit exegesis from Abbad ibn Mansur, from al-Hasan, and he was known.” He mentioned that he was Surur ibn al-Mughirah ibn Zadhan, the nephew of Mansur ibn Zadhan. Ibn Abi Hatim likewise mentioned this in Narrator Criticism and Accreditation (2/1/325) and said: “He narrated from Abbad ibn Mansur. Abu Said Ahmad ibn Dawud al-Haddad narrated from him. I asked my father about him, and he said: ‘He is a shaykh.’”