Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

He appears to have regarded it as disliked in one’s place of residence only because it becomes frequent, while not everyone is entitled to it. If a person does it with some people but not others, those whom he leaves out will resent it, thinking that he has fallen short in their rights and favoured others over them; and the complete greeting is the handshake.”

Know also that some imams, such as Abu Hanifah and his companion Muhammad, held embracing to be disliked. Al-Tahawi related this view from both of them, in contrast to Abu Yusuf. Imam Malik was among them as well. In al-Adab al-Shar‘iyyah (2/278), it states: “Malik disapproved of embracing one who had returned from a journey, saying, ‘It is a blameworthy innovation.’ He explained the Prophet’s doing so with Ja‘far when he arrived by saying that it was particular to him. Sufyan said to him, ‘Do not single him out without evidence.’ Malik then remained silent.” Al-Qadi said: “His silence indicates that he accepted and agreed with Sufyan’s statement, and that is correct unless evidence for such specification is established.”

Imam al-Baghawi’s statement that one should not kiss the mouth has already preceded. Shaykh Ibn Muflih explained the reason for this in al-Adab al-Shar‘iyyah, saying (2/275): “Kissing the mouth is disliked, because it is rarely done merely as a mark of honour.” It also seems to me, for another reason, that it has not been reported from the early generations; had it been good, they would have preceded us in doing it. How excellent is the saying:

Every good lies in following those who came before,
and every evil lies in the innovation of those who came after.

It is astonishing, then, that that Aleppine doctor, the storyteller-preacher, who has set himself up to refute Salafi scholars and their followers, tracking down their slips and statements which, in his view, contradict the scholars’ positions, forgets himself. I heard a recording of his in which he censured one of them for holding that kissing the mouth is not prescribed, and explicitly declared that it is like kissing the forehead or the hand, with no difference between them! Thus, he fell into the very مخالفة he denounces the Salafis for. Had one of them drawn this “novel” analogy, he would have thundered and raged, shouted and wept theatrically, and marshalled every statement of the scholars that he could! But as for him, there is no harm—

وإنما كره ذلك في الحضر فيما يرى لأنه يكثر ولا يستوجبه كل أحد، فإن فعله الرجل ببعض الناس دون بعض وجد عليه الذين تركهم، وظنوا أنه قصر بحقوقهم، وآثر عليهم، وتمام التحية المصافحة ". واعلم أنه قد ذهب بعض الأئمة كأبي حنيفة وصاحبه محمد إلى كراهة المعانقة، حكاه عنهما الطحاوي خلافا لأبي يوسف. ومنهم الإمام مالك، ففي " الآداب الشرعية " (٢ / ٢٧٨) : " وكره مالك معانقة القادم من سفر، وقال: " بدعة "، واعتذر عن فعل النبي ﷺ ذلك بجعفر حين قدم، بأنه خاص له، فقال له سفيان: ما تخصه بغير دليل، فسكت مالك. قال القاضي: وسكوته دليل لتسليم قول سفيان وموافقته، وهو الصواب حتى يقوم دليل التخصيص " . هذا وقد تقدم في كلام الإمام البغوي قوله بأنه لا يقبل الفم، وبين وجه ذلك الشيخ ابن مفلح في " الآداب الشرعية "، فقال (٢ / ٢٧٥) : " ويكره تقبيل الفم، لأنه قل أن يقع كرامة ". ويبدو لي من وجه آخر، وهو أنه لم يرو عن السلف، ولو كان خيرا لسبقونا إليه، وما أحسن ما قيل: وكل خير في اتباع من سلف وكل شر في ابتداع من خلف. فالعجب من ذاك الدكتور الحلبي القصاص الواعظ الذي نصب نفسه للرد على علماء السلفيين وأتباعهم، وتتبع عثراتهم، وأقوالهم المخالفة لأقوال العلماء بزعمه، وينسى نفسه، فقد سمعت له شريطا ينكر فيه على أحدهم عدم شرعية تقبيل الفم، ويصرح بأنه كتقبيل الجبهة واليد وأنه لا فرق! فوقع في المخالفة التي ينكرها على السلفيين، ولو أن أحدا منهم قاس هذا القياس (البديع!) لأبرق وأرعد وصاح وتباكى، وحشد كل ما يستطيع حشده من أقوال العلماء! وأما هو فلا بأس

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies