It also has a corroborating report from Aisha, attributed to the Prophet, with similar wording. It was narrated by Abu Ya'la (8/188/4745) and al-Tabarani in al-Awsat (1/239/2/4037), through Umar ibn Sa'd al-Nasri, from Layth, from Mujahid, from Aisha, with similar wording.

Al-Tabarani said, “No one narrated it from Layth except Umar ibn Sa'd.” I say: Al-Bukhari declared him weak in al-Tarikh, saying (2/3/158), “His hadith has not been established as sound.” Al-Dhahabi concurred with this in al-Mizan, as did al-Hafiz in al-Lisan. However, neither of them identified him as al-Nasri, unlike al-Bukhari and Ibn Abi Hatim, who both gave him this attribution. It seems that al-Hafiz overlooked this; thus, after this biographical entry, he added another entry, saying: “Umar ibn Sa'd al-Nadri” (thus written there, with a dotted d!). He then mentioned that he narrated from Layth ibn Abi Sulaym and others, and that Isma'il ibn Musa al-Fazari and Musa ibn Isma'il narrated from him. These are the very two whom Ibn Abi Hatim mentioned in the first entry, as did al-Bukhari, except that he did not mention Musa ibn Isma'il. Al-Hafiz was thus led to think that he was someone other than the first, whereas he is in fact the same person; hence the need to point this out.

I then came across a third route for the hadith from Abu Hurayrah, in which its transmitter, Abu Jamrah, stopped its attribution at him. He said, “Abu Abd al-Aziz informed me from him,” with similar wording. Al-Bukhari narrated it in al-Adab al-Mufrad (7181). Its narrators are trustworthy narrators used by Muslim, apart from this Abu Abd al-Aziz, who is unknown, as Abu Hatim and others said. Ibn Hibban, however, included him—according to his usual practice—in al-Thiqat (5/590), and cited part of this hadith in his entry.