Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

“Al-Tabarani narrated it in al-Kabir, and its narrators have been declared reliable, apart from al-Tabarani’s shaykh, ‘Abd Allah ibn Wuhayb al-Ghazzi (1), whom I do not know.”

What further confirms its weakness is that it does not occur in the other chains of the hadith. ‘Abd al-Razzaq said in al-Musannaf (1926)—and Ahmad narrated it from him (4/220): from Ma‘mar, from ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr, from a shaykh whose name he had mentioned, from Nu‘aym al-Nahham, with something similar to it but without this addition. Its narrators are reliable and are among the narrators of the two Shaykhs, apart from the unnamed shaykh, who was either a Companion or a senior Successor; for ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr, who narrated from him, was among the senior Successors and was born during the lifetime of the Prophet. He was perhaps the former, for ‘Abd al-Razzaq said immediately afterward (1927): from Ibn Jurayj, from Nafi‘, from ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Umar, from Nu‘aym al-Nahham, with something similar to it, but without the addition.

Al-Hakim narrated it by way of ‘Abd al-Razzaq (3/259) and said: “Its chain of transmission is authentic.” Al-Dhahabi concurred with him, and it is as they said. Indeed, it meets the conditions of the two Shaykhs, provided Ibn Jurayj heard it from Nafi‘ and did not engage in concealment in transmission. But ‘Umar ibn Nafi‘ corroborated him from Nafi‘ with it. Ibn Qani‘ narrated it, as cited in al-Isabah. In al-Fath (2/98–99), he said: “’Abd al-Razzaq and others narrated it with an authentic chain of transmission.”

Isma‘il ibn ‘Ayyash differed with Sulayman ibn Bilal in its chain of transmission, saying: Yahya ibn Sa‘id related to me; he said: Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Hibban informed me, from Nu‘aym al-Nahham

(1) The original reads al-‘Uri, without dotting; the correction is based on al-Mu‘jam al-Saghir (no. 1108, al-Rawd al-Nadir edition) and al-Awsat, where he appears in eight hadiths (nos. 4534-4542 in my numbering). His shaykh in these reports is Muhammad ibn al-Mutawakkil ibn Abi al-Sari al-‘Asqalani. Al-Mizzi mentions him among those who narrated from him, though with a slight variation, stating: “Abu al-‘Abbas ‘Abd Allah ibn Muhammad ibn Wuhayb al-Judhami al-Ghazzi.” Ibn ‘Asakir would presumably have included a biographical entry for him in Tarikh Dimashq, but the extant copy contains a lacuna. And Allah knows best.
" رواه الطبراني في الكبير ، ورجاله موثقون خلا شيخ الطبراني عبد الله بن وهيب الغزي (١) فلم أعرفه ". ومما يؤكد ضعفها عدم ورودها في طرق الحديث الأخرى، فقال عبد الرزاق في " المصنف " (١٩٢٦) وعنه أحمد (٤ / ٢٢٠) : عن معمر عن عبيد بن عمير عن شيخ قد سماه عن نعيم بن النحام به نحوه دونها. ورجاله ثقات رجال الشيخين غير الشيخ الذي لم يسم، وهو صحابي أو تابعي كبير، فإن عبيد بن عمير الراوي عنه من كبار التابعين، ولد في عهد النبي ﷺ، ولعله الأول، فقد قال عبد الرزاق (١٩٢٧) عقبه: عن ابن جريج عن نافع عن عبد الله بن عمر عن نعيم بن النحام به نحوه. دون الزيادة. ومن طريق عبد الرزاق أخرجه الحاكم (٣ / ٢٥٩) وقال: " صحيح الإسناد ". ووافقه الذهبي، وهو كما قالا، بل هو على شرط الشيخين إن كان ابن جريج سمعه من نافع ولم يدلس. لكن تابعه عمر بن نافع عن نافع به. أخرجه ابن قانع كما في " الإصابة "، وقال في " الفتح " (٢ / ٩٨ - ٩٩) : " أخرجه عبد الرزاق وغيره بإسناد صحيح ". وخالف إسماعيل بن عياش سليمان بن بلال في إسناده، فقال: حدثني يحيى بن سعيد قال: أخبرني محمد بن يحيى بن حبان عن نعيم بن النحام ...
(١) الأصل (العري) بالإهمال، والتصحيح من " المعجم الصغير " (١١٠٨ / الروض النضير) و " الأوسط " وله فيه ثمانية أحاديث (٤٥٣٤ - ٤٥٤٢ بترقيمي) وشيخه فيها (محمد بن المتوكل بن أبي السري العسقلاني) وفي الرواة عنه ذكره المزي لكن باختلاف يسير، فقال: " وأبو العباس عبد الله بن محمد بن وهيب الجذامي الغزي ". والمفروض أن يكون ابن عساكر ترجم له في " تاريخ دمشق " لكن في النسخة خرم. والله أعلم.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies