Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

The author of al-Rawd al-Bāsim fī al-Dhabb ʿan Sunnat Abī al-Qāsim reported from him that he deemed its chain of transmission good. I have not found this in his work al-Tafsīr; perhaps it appears in one of his other books. Indeed, grading this chain as good is what the principles of this noble science require, for it revolves around ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī al-Zinād, concerning whom al-Ḥāfiẓ said: “Truthful; his memory deteriorated after he came to Baghdad, and he was a jurist.”

Thus, al-Haythamī’s statement (7/16), “Ahmad and al-Ṭabarānī narrated it in a similar form. Its chain contains ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī al-Zinād, who is weak, though he has been declared trustworthy; and the rest of Ahmad’s narrators are reliable,” is not well phrased. I say: his description of him as “weak, though he has been declared trustworthy” is unsound, because it gives preference to the view of those who deemed him weak over that of those who declared him trustworthy. The truth is that he occupies a middle rank and his hadith are good, unless he contradicts others; yet this cannot be inferred from the statement just quoted concerning him. And Allah knows best.

An important benefit: Once you know that the three verses—“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed—then it is they who are the disbelievers”; “then it is they who are the wrongdoers”; and “then it is they who are the defiantly disobedient”—were revealed concerning the Jews and their statement about his judgment, peace and blessings be upon him: “If he gives you what you want, appoint him as arbiter; but if he does not give it to you, then beware of him and do not appoint him as arbiter”—and that the Quran alluded to this statement of theirs before these verses, saying: “They say, ‘If you are given this, then accept it; but if you are not given it, then beware’”—once you know this, it is not permissible to apply these verses to certain Muslim rulers and judges who rule by other than what Allah has revealed, namely man-made laws. I say: it is not permissible thereby to declare them disbelievers and expel them from the religion if they believe in Allah and His Messenger, even though they are sinful for ruling by other than what Allah has revealed. This is not permissible, for although they resemble the Jews in the respect mentioned regarding their ruling, they differ from them in respect of

وقد نقل عنه صاحب " الروض الباسم في الذب عن سنة أبي القاسم " أنه حسن إسناده. ولم أر هذا في كتابه: " التفسير " ، فلعله في بعض كتبه الأخرى. وتحسين هذا الإسناد هو الذي تقتضيه قواعد هذا العلم الشريف، فإن مداره على عبد الرحمن بن أبي الزناد، وهو كما قال الحافظ : " صدوق، تغير حفظه لما قدم بغداد، وكان فقيها ". فقول الهيثمي (٧ / ١٦) : " رواه أحمد والطبراني بنحوه، وفيه عبد الرحمن بن أبي الزناد، وهو ضعيف ، وقد وثق، وبقية رجال أحمد ثقات ". قلت: فقوله فيه: " ضعيف، وقد وثق " ليس بجيد لأنه يرجح قول من ضعفه على قول من وثقه، والحق أنه وسط حسن الحديث، إلا أن يخالف وهذا مما لا يستفاد من قوله المذكور فيه. والله أعلم. (فائدة هامة) : إذا علمت أن الآيات الثلاث: * (ومن لم يحكم بما أنزل الله فأولئك هم الكافرون) *، * (فأولئك هم الظالمون) *، * (فأولئك هم الفاسقون) * نزلت في اليهود وقولهم في حكمه ﷺ: " إن أعطاكم ما تريدون حكمتموه، وإن لم يعطكم حذرتم فلم تحكموه "، وقد أشار القرآن إلى قولهم هذا قبل هذه الآيات فقال: * (يقولون إن أوتيتم هذا فخذوه، وإن لم تؤتوه فاحذروا) *، إذا عرفت هذا، فلا يجوز حمل هذه الآيات على بعض الحكام المسلمين وقضاتهم الذين يحكمون بغير ما أنزل الله من القوانين الأرضية، أقول: لا يجوز تكفيرهم بذلك، وإخراجهم من الملة إذا كانوا مؤمنين بالله ورسوله، وإن كانوا مجرمين بحكمهم بغير ما أنزل الله، لا يجوز ذلك، لأنهم وإن كانوا كاليهود من جهة حكمهم المذكور، فهم مخالفون لهم من جهة

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies