Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

then its chain of transmission is authentic. In any case, it is supported by what follows.

  1. As for the hadith of Sahl, it is narrated by ʿIyad ibn ʿAbd Allah al-Fihri and others, from Ibn Shihab, from Sahl, in the hadith concerning spouses who undergo liʿan: “Thereafter, the established sunnah regarding spouses who undergo liʿan was that they be separated and never reunite.” Abu Dawud (1/351–352) and al-Bayhaqi (7/410) narrated it.

I say: This is a good chain of transmission, and its narrators are among Muslim’s narrators. Although this al-Fihri has some weakness, it is not severe; thus, such a narrator may be cited in corroboration—especially since he was not alone in narrating it, for another narrator was coupled with him. Although this other narrator is not named in this version, it is possible that he is the forthcoming al-Zubaydi. If so, it is a strong corroboration, because this al-Zubaydi—whose name was Muhammad ibn Ziyad—was a thoroughly trustworthy narrator and one of al-Zuhri’s foremost students, as al-Hafiz said. If he is someone else, then he is unknown; if his report does not strengthen it, neither does it harm it.

This corroborating report is narrated by al-Awzaʿi, from al-Zubaydi, from al-Zuhri, with the same wording. Al-Bayhaqi narrated it. I say: Its chain of transmission is authentic; all its narrators are trustworthy, except Ibn Abi Hassan, the shaykh of Abu Bakr al-Ismaʿili, whose name I have not presently identified.

3 and 4. As for the hadiths of Ibn Masʿud and ʿAli, they are narrated by Qays ibn al-Rabiʿ, from ʿAsim, from Abu Waʾil, from ʿAbd Allah; and from ʿAsim, from Zirr, from ʿAli. They said: “The established sunnah concerning spouses who undergo liʿan is that they never reunite.” ʿAbd al-Razzaq narrated it in al-Musannaf (7/112/12434 and 12436), as did al-Bayhaqi; and al-Tabarani narrated it in al-Muʿjam al-Kabir (9/390/9661) from Ibn Masʿud alone.

I say: Its chain of transmission is good for corroborative purposes, at the very least, because Qays ibn al-Rabiʿ has weakness due to his retention.

فهو صحيح الإسناد، وعلى كل حال ، فإنه يشهد له ما بعده. ٢ - وأما حديث سهل فيرويه عياض بن عبد الله الفهري وغيره عن ابن شهاب عن سهل في حديث المتلاعنين قال: " فمضت السنة بعد في المتلاعنين أن يفرق بينهما، ثم لا يجتمعان أبدا ". أخرجه أبو داود (١ / ٣٥١ - ٣٥٢) والبيهقي (٧ / ٤١٠) . قلت: وهذا إسناد جيد، ورجاله رجال مسلم، والفهري هذا وإن كان فيه ضعف، فليس شديدا، فمثله يستشهد به، ولاسيما أنه لم يتفرد به، فقد قرن به غيره، وهذا وإن لم يسم في هذه الرواية فمن المحتمل أن يكون الزبيدي الآتي، فإن كان هو، فهي متابعة قوية لأن الزبيدي هذا - واسمه محمد بن زياد - ثقة ثبت من كبار أصحاب الزهري كما قال الحافظ، وإن كان غيره، فهو مجهول إن لم يقو حديثه فلا يضره. وهذه المتابعة يرويها الأوزاعي عن الزبيدي عن الزهري به. أخرجه البيهقي. قلت: وإسناده صحيح، رجاله ثقات غير ابن أبي حسان شيخ أبي بكر الإسماعيلي، فلم أعرف اسمه الآن. ٣ و ٤ - وأما حديث ابن مسعود وعلي فيرويه قيس بن الربيع عن عاصم عن أبي وائل عن عبد الله، وعن عاصم عن زر عن علي قالا: " مضت السنة في المتلاعنين أن لا يجتمعا أبدا ". أخرجه عبد الرزاق في " المصنف " (٧ / ١١٢ / ١٢٤٣٤ و ١٢٤٣٦) والبيهقي والطبراني في " المعجم الكبير " (٩ / ٣٩٠ / ٩٦٦١) عن ابن مسعود وحده . قلت: وإسناده حسن في المتابعات على الأقل لأن قيس بن الربيع فيه ضعف من قبل حفظه.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies