Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani
  1. As for the hadith of Tamīm, it is narrated by ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, concerning whom the reports differ in several ways:

First: Abū Badr said: “ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz narrated to us, saying: ‘Someone whom I do not regard as suspect informed me, from Tamīm al-Dārī, who said: “I asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ about a man from among the people of disbelief who embraces Islam at the hands of a Muslim man: what is the prescribed ruling concerning him? He said: ‘The one [at whose hands he embraced Islam] has the greatest right to him in his life and after his death.’”’”

It was transmitted by Abū ʿAmr ibn al-Sammāk in his Hadith (2/25/1), and from him by al-Bayhaqī (10/296).

I say: This is a good chain of transmission. Its narrators are trustworthy, were it not for the unnamed man. Although he was trustworthy and not regarded with suspicion by ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿUmar, who narrated from him, such a declaration of reliability is not accepted by the majority so long as the narrator thus declared reliable remains unnamed. However, he is named in some of the forthcoming narrations, where it becomes clear that he is trustworthy. The hadith is thereby established, praise be to Allah.

Second: Yaḥyā ibn Ḥamzah said: “ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz narrated to me, saying: ‘I heard ʿAbd Allah ibn Mawhab narrate to ʿUmar ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz, from Qabīṣah ibn Dhuʾayb, from Tamīm, with this report.’”

It was transmitted by Abū Dāwūd (2/20), al-Ḥākim (2/219), al-Bayhaqī (10/296, 297), and al-Ṭabarānī in al-Kabīr (1273), through several routes from Yaḥyā with this report.

I say: This is a good chain of transmission. All its narrators are trustworthy and are narrators whose reports appear in the two Sahihs, apart from ʿAbd Allah ibn Mawhab—though it has also been said: Ibn Wahb; the former is correct—and he is trustworthy, as stated in al-Taqrīb. However, although ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz is among their narrators, some scholars criticized him on account of his retention. Al-Dhahabī said in al-Mughnī: “A group declared him trustworthy, while Abū Mushir deemed him weak.”

٢ - وأما حديث تميم فيرويه عبد العزيز بن عمر بن عبد العزيز، وقد اختلف عليه على وجوه: الأول: قال أبو بدر: حدثنا عبد العزيز قال: أخبرني من لا أتهم عن تميم الداري قال: " سألت رسول الله ﷺ عن الرجل من أهل الكفر يسلم على يدي الرجل من المسلمين، ما السنة فيه؟ قال: من أولى الناس بمحياه ومماته ". أخرجه أبو عمرو بن السماك في " حديثه " (٢ / ٢٥ / ١) وعنه البيهقي (١٠ / ٢٩٦) . قلت: وهذا إسناد حسن، رجاله ثقات لولا الرجل الذي لم يسم، وإن كان ثقة غير متهم عند الراوي عنه عبد العزيز بن عمر لأن مثل هذا التوثيق غير مقبول عند الجمهور ما دام أنه لم يسم الراوي الموثق، لكنه قد سمي في بعض الروايات الآتية، فظهر أنه ثقة، وبذلك يثبت الحديث، والحمد لله. الثاني: قال: يحيى بن حمزة: حدثني عبد العزيز بن عمر بن عبد العزيز قال: سمعت عبد الله بن موهب يحدث عمر بن عبد العزيز عن قبيصة بن ذؤيب عن تميم به. أخرجه أبو داود (٢ / ٢٠) والحاكم (٢ / ٢١٩) والبيهقي (١٠ / ٢٩٦، ٢٩٧) والطبراني في " الكبير " (١٢٧٣) من طرق عن يحيى به. قلت: وهذا إسناد حسن ، رجاله كلهم ثقات رجال الشيخين غير عبد الله بن موهب - وقيل: ابن وهب، والصواب الأول - وهو ثقة كما في " التقريب " غير أن عبد العزيز بن عمر بن عبد العزيز، مع كونه من رجالهما، فقد تكلم فيه بعضهم من قبل حفظه، فقال الذهبي في " المغني ": " وثقه جماعة، وضعفه أبو مسهر ".

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies