Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Aḥmad recorded it (3/490).

I say: Its chain of transmission is sound; all of its narrators are trustworthy. Although Ibn Lahīʿah had a poor memory, his hadiths as transmitted by the ʿAbādilah—the noted transmitters named ʿAbd Allāh—are authentic, as is well known among the scholars. This report is transmitted from him by one of them, namely the imam ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak. Yet this fact escaped al-Munāwī when he declared the hadith defective, saying: “It contains Ibn Lahīʿah!” He erred again, for he said this after al-Suyūṭī attributed the hadith to Ibn Mājah, thereby giving the impression that Ibn Mājah had transmitted it through Ibn Lahīʿah. In fact, this is not so: Ibn Lahīʿah does not occur in its chain of transmission, as you have seen.

The hadith has a third route, narrated by Khālid ibn Yazīd ibn Abī Mālik from his father, who related it to him from Wāthilah ibn al-Asqaʿ, one of the people of al-Suffah. It contains the hadith in full, in a more complete form, and includes the words, “In the name of Allah.” Al-Ḥākim recorded it (4/116–117) and said: “Its chain of transmission is authentic.” Al-Dhahabī rebutted him, saying: “I say: Khālid is trustworthy; some declared him trustworthy, but al-Nasāʾī said: ‘He is not trustworthy.’”

I say: Al-Taqrīb states: “He is weak, despite being a jurist, and Ibn Maʿīn accused him of lying.”

I say: Therefore, reliance is upon the preceding route. The hadith also has a supporting report narrated by ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās and attributed to the Prophet: “Blessing descends into the middle of the bowl, so eat from its sides and do not eat from its top.” Al-Ṭaḥāwī recorded it in Mushkil al-Āthār (1/55), as did others, with an authentic chain of transmission. It is also cited in al-Mishkāh (4211).

أخرجه أحمد (٣ / ٤٩٠) . قلت: وإسناده جيد، رجاله كلهم ثقات، فإن ابن لهيعة وإن كان سيء الحفظ فإن حديثه من رواية العبادلة صحيح، كما هو معروف عند أهل العلم، وهذا من رواية أحدهم عنه، وهو عبد الله بن المبارك الإمام، ولقد خفيت هذه الحقيقة على المناوي حين أعل الحديث بقوله: " وفيه ابن لهيعة "! وقد وهم مرة أخرى، فإنه قال ذلك عقب عزو السيوطي الحديث لابن ماجة، فأوهم أنه رواه من طريق ابن لهيعة، والواقع خلافه، فليس في إسناده ابن لهيعة كما رأيت. وللحديث طريق ثالث، يرويه خالد بن يزيد بن أبي مالك عن أبيه أنه حدثه عن واثلة بن الأسقع، وكان من أهل الصفة.. الحديث بطوله وأتم منه، وفيه البسملة. أخرجه الحاكم (٤ / ١١٦ - ١١٧) وقال: " صحيح الإسناد ". ورده الذهبي بقوله: " قلت: خالد ثقة وثقه بعضهم، وقال النسائي: ليس ثقة ". قلت: وفي " التقريب ": " ضعيف مع كونه فقيها، وقد اتهمه ابن معين ". قلت: فالعمدة على الطريق التي قبله. وللحديث شاهد يرويه عبد الله بن عباس مرفوعا بلفظ: " إن البركة تنزل وسط القصعة، فكلوا من نواحيها ولا تأكلوا من رأسها ". أخرجه الطحاوي في " مشكل الآثار " (١ / ٥٥) وغيره بسند صحيح وهو مخرج في " المشكاة " (٤٢١١) .

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies