198), and Ibn ʿAdī in al-Kāmil (folio 210/1), and al-Ṭabarānī in al-Awsaṭ (5366), through ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ḥakīm Abū Bakr al-Dāhirī, from Yūsuf ibn Ṣuhayb, from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Buraydah, from his father, traced back to the Prophet.

Al-Bukhārī said: “It is not sound.” Al-ʿUqaylī said: “This Abū Bakr narrates hadiths that have no basis and ascribes them to trustworthy narrators.” Ibn ʿAdī said: “His hadith are rejected, and al-Bukhārī said: ‘This hadith is not sound.’” Al-Dhahabī said in the section on agnomens in his Mīzān: “He is neither trustworthy nor dependable.”

Al-Haythamī cited the hadith in al-Majmaʿ (5/156) and said: “Al-Ṭabarānī narrated it, and it contains ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ḥakīm, who is weak.” Al-Manāwī quoted him as saying: “It contains ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ḥakīm, whom I do not know, while the rest of its narrators are trustworthy.” It seems that he said this elsewhere. The correct view is that he is known, but known to be weak, as he stated in the first place.

Moreover, al-Suyūṭī did not attribute it to al-Ṭabarānī, nor did I find it in his al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr, which is what is intended when a report is attributed to him without qualification. The correct attribution, then, is to specify al-Awsaṭ, as mentioned above. Al-Suyūṭī attributed it only to al-Bazzār, but with the wording: “...the intoxicated person, one who has anointed himself with saffron, the menstruating woman, and the person in a state of major ritual impurity!” That makes four categories! Perhaps the original wording was: “and the menstruating woman or the person in a state of major ritual impurity.”