Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

al-Hudhayl, from Khabbab, from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. Abu Nu‘aym said: “It is singular among the reports of al-Ajlah and al-Thawri; Abu Ahmad alone transmitted it.”

I say: This is a good chain of transmission. Its narrators are trustworthy and are among those relied upon by Muslim, apart from al-Ajlah, who was al-Ajlah ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Hujayyah. He was truthful, as al-Dhahabi stated in al-Du‘afa’ and al-Hafiz in al-Taqrib. There is no criticism of him other than his being a Shi‘ite, but this does not impair his transmission, since the essential criterion in such matters is truthfulness, as al-Hafiz explained in Sharh al-Nukhbah.

Al-Haythami said in al-Majma‘ (1/189): “Al-Tabarani narrated it in al-Kabir, and its narrators have been declared trustworthy. There is disagreement concerning al-Ajlah al-Kindi, though the majority consider him trustworthy.”

‘Abd al-Haqq al-Ishbili included the hadith in al-Ahkam (folio 8/1) and said: “Al-Bazzar narrated it through Sharik—namely, ibn ‘Abd Allah—from Abu Sinan, from Abu—perhaps Ibn Abi—al-Hudhayl, from Khabbab, attributed to the Prophet. He said: ‘This is a good chain of transmission.’ This is what he said, though it is not a report that may be used as proof.”

I say: That is because of the weakness of Sharik ibn ‘Abd Allah al-Qadi; however, the first route corroborates and strengthens it. Al-Haythami did not include it in Kashf al-Astar ‘an Zawa’id al-Bazzar, so perhaps it occurs somewhere other than his Musnad.

“Storytelling”: In al-Nihayah, it states: “In one version: ‘When they perished, they took to storytelling’; that is, they relied on speech and abandoned deeds, and this became the cause of their destruction. Or the reverse: when they perished through abandoning deeds, they gave themselves over to storytelling.”

I say: It is also possible to say that the cause of their destruction was their preachers’ preoccupation with stories and anecdotes rather than religious understanding and beneficial knowledge that acquaints people with their religion and thereby impels them to act

الهذيل عن خباب عن النبي ﷺ. وقال أبو نعيم: " غريب من حديث الأجلح والثوري، تفرد به أبو أحمد ". قلت: وهذا إسناد حسن، رجاله ثقات رجال مسلم غير الأجلح وهو ابن عبد الله بن حجية، وهو صدوق كما قال الذهبي في " الضعفاء " والحافظ في " التقريب " ولا عيب فيه سوى أنه شيعي ولكن ذلك لا يضر في الرواية لأن العمدة فيها إنما هو الصدق كما حرره الحافظ في " شرح النخبة ". وقال الهيثمي في " المجمع " (١ / ١٨٩) : " رواه الطبراني في " الكبير " ورجاله موثقون، واختلف في الأجلح الكندي، والأكثر على توثيقه ". والحديث أورده عبد الحق الإشبيلي في " الأحكام " (ق ٨ / ١) وقال: " رواه البزار من حديث شريك - هو ابن عبد الله - عن أبي سنان عن أبي - لعله عن ابن أبي - الهزيل عن خباب مرفوعا وقال: هذا إسناد حسن كذا قال: وليس مما يحتج به. قلت: وذلك لضعف شريك بن عبد الله القاضي، لكن الطريق الأولى تشهد له وتقويه . ولم يورده الهيثمي في " كشف الأستار عن زوائد البزار " فلعله في غير " المسند " له. (قصوا) قال في " النهاية ": وفي رواية: " لما هلكوا قصوا " أي اتكلوا على القول وتركوا العمل، فكان ذلك سبب هلاكهم، أو بالعكس، لما هلكوا بترك العمل أخلدوا إلى القصص ". وأقول: ومن الممكن أن يقال: إن سبب هلاكهم اهتمام وعاظهم بالقصص والحكايات دون الفقه والعلم النافع الذي يعرف الناس بدينهم فيحملهم ذلك على العمل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies