Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

—(11/214), citing two other men who narrated from him—without mentioning either any criticism or commendation of him. Ibn Qaniʿ said: “He died in 284 AH.”

He was corroborated: Abu Nuʿaym recorded it in al-Hilyah (8/174): “ʿAbd Allah ibn Jaʿfar narrated to us; Ismaʿil ibn ʿAbd Allah narrated to us; Nuʿaym ibn Hammad narrated to us,” with the same chain, except that he said: “that I should give precedence to the elder.” He also said: “Both ʿAbd Allah ibn al-Mubarak and ʿAbd Allah ibn Wahb narrated it from Usamah.”

I say: This indicates that neither Nuʿaym nor Ibn al-Mubarak was alone in narrating the hadith; rather, Usamah ibn Zayd alone narrated it from Nafiʿ. His hadith is good, if he is Usamah al-Laythi, the Medinan client of the Layth tribe. But if he is al-ʿAdawi, the Medinan client of ʿUmar, then he is weak. Both of them narrated from Nafiʿ, and Ibn al-Mubarak and Ibn Wahb narrated from both of them, so I could not determine which of the two is intended here.

Then I found more than one corroborator for Nuʿaym. Ahmad (2/138) and al-Bayhaqi (1/40) recorded it through two other routes from ʿAbd Allah ibn al-Mubarak, with the same chain. It also clarifies the circumstance in which it was said. Its wording is: “I saw the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, using a toothstick, and he gave it to the eldest of the people. Then he said:” He then cited it in the wording of al-Hilyah.

Al-Bukhari recorded it in suspended form in his Sahih (1/284—Fath), through Nuʿaym ibn Hammad. The hadith master stated that Usamah was Usamah ibn Zayd al-Laythi, the Medinan. I do not know what evidence he based this on, although the eminent Ahmad Shakir followed him in this in his commentary on al-Musnad. Perhaps this was inferred from the great standing and learning of Imam ʿAbd Allah ibn al-Mubarak: had he meant the weak al-ʿAdawi, he would have made that clear. Or perhaps he had a practice whereby, when narrating from the trustworthy al-Laythi, he left his tribal affiliation unspecified, whereas when narrating from the other, weak narrator, he identified him by it. And Allah knows best.

It has also been corroborated in general. Al-Bukhari recorded it in suspended form, while al-Bayhaqi and others recorded it with a connected chain, through ʿAffan: Sakhr ibn Juwayriyyah narrated to us, from Nafiʿ, from Ibn ʿUmar, that the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said:

(١١ / ٢١٤) برواية اثنين آخرين عنه، ولم يذكر فيه جرحا. ولا تعديلا. قال ابن قانع: مات سنة (٢٨٤) . وقد توبع، فأخرجه أبو نعيم في " الحلبة " (٨ / ١٧٤) : حدثنا عبد الله بن جعفر حدثنا إسماعيل بن عبد الله حدثنا نعيم بن حماد به إلا أنه قال: " أن أكبر ". وقال: " رواه عبد الله بن المبارك وعبد الله بن وهب جميعا عن أسامة ". قلت: وفيه إشعار بأن الحديث لم يتفرد به نعيم ولا ابن المبارك، إنما تفرد به أسامة بن زيد. وهو حسن الحديث، إن كان الليثي مولاهم المدني، وأما إن كان العدوي مولى عمر المدني فهو ضعيف، وكلاهما يروي عن نافع. وعنهما ابن المبارك وابن وهب فلم أدر أيهما المراد هنا. ثم وجدت لنعيم أكثر من تابع واحد ، فأخرجه أحمد (٢ / ١٣٨) والبيهقي (١ / ٤٠) من طريقين آخرين عن عبد الله ابن المبارك به. وفيه بيان سبب وروده، ولفظه: " رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وهو يستن، فأعطاه أكبر القوم، ثم قال: " فذكره بلفظ " الحلية ". وعلقه البخاري في " صحيحه " (١ / ٢٨٤ - فتح) من طريق نعيم بن حماد. وذكر الحافظ أن أسامة هو ابن زيد الليثي المدني. ولا أدري ما مستنده في هذا؟ وإن تبعه عليه العلامة أحمد شاكر في تعليقه على المسند. نعم لعل ذلك إنما هو النظر إلى جلالة الإمام عبد الله بن المبارك وعلمه، فإنه لو كان يعني العدوي الضعيف لبينه. أو لعل له عادة إذا روى عن الليثي الثقة أطلق ولم ينسبه، وإذا روى عن الآخر الضعيف قيده فنسبه. والله أعلم. وقد توبع عليه في الجملة. فأخرجه البخاري تعليقا والبيهقي وغيره موصولا من طريق عفان حدثنا صخر بن جويرية عن نافع عن ابن عمر أن النبي ﷺ قال:

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies