Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

“It was narrated by al-Tabarani, and its chain includes Muhammad ibn al-Hasan ibn Zubalah, who is abandoned.”

I say: Kurayb’s chain is free of him, hence the need to point this out. It also has a corroborating report from the hadith of Aishah, attributed to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, with the same wording except for the word “after”; however, it mentions Mary first. Al-Hakim narrated it (3/185 and 186) and made no comment on it, while al-Dhahabi said: “Authentic according to the conditions of the two Shaykhs.” And it is as he said.

1509 — “Indeed, the best means of changing this gray hair are henna and katam.”

It was narrated by Abu Dawud (2/195—Taziyah edition), al-Nasai (2/279), al-Tirmidhi (3/55—Tuhfah edition), Ibn Majah (2/380), Ibn Hibban (1475), Ahmad (5/147, 150, 154, 156, and 169), Ibn Sad in al-Tabaqat (1/439), and al-Tabarani (1638), through two chains from Abdullah ibn Buraydah, from Abu al-Aswad, from Abu Dharr, from the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. Al-Tirmidhi said: “A good, authentic hadith. Abu al-Aswad al-Du'ali’s name was Zalim ibn Amr ibn Sufyan.”

I say: He is trustworthy and one of the narrators relied upon by the two Shaykhs; the same is true of Abdullah ibn Buraydah. Thus, it is authentic according to their conditions. It is therefore astonishing that al-Hakim did not include it. It cannot be said that he omitted it because Kahmas narrated it as a mursal report, saying: “From Abdullah ibn Buraydah, that it had reached him that the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said...” Then he related it. Al-Nasai narrated this version.

This cannot be argued, because his methodological position is that an addition from a trustworthy narrator is accepted—and that is correct, subject to qualifications well known in hadith methodology. Moreover, two trustworthy narrators transmitted it from Abdullah ibn Buraydah with a connected chain traced back to the Prophet, as mentioned above; their addition is therefore unanimously accepted, especially since it has another chain from Abu Dharr, narrated by Abu Ishaq from Ibn Abi Layla from him, attributed to the Prophet, with the wording:

" رواه الطبراني، وفيه محمد بن الحسن بن زبالة وهو متروك ". قلت: طريق كريب سالم منه، فاقتضى التنبيه. وله شاهد من حديث عائشة مرفوعا مثله دون لفظة " بعد " ولكنه قدم (مريم) في الذكر. أخرجه الحاكم (٣ / ١٨٥ و١٨٦) وسكت عنه، وقال الذهبي: " صحيح على شرط الشيخين ". وهو كما قال. ١٥٠٩ - " إن أحسن ما غير به هذا الشيب الحناء والكتم ". أخرجه أبو داود (٢ / ١٩٥ - تازية) والنسائي (٢ / ٢٧٩) والترمذي (٣ / ٥٥ - تحفة) وابن ماجة (٢ / ٣٨٠) وابن حبان (١٤٧٥) وأحمد (٥ / ١٤٧ و ١٥٠ و١٥٤ و ١٥٦ و ١٦٩) وابن سعد في " الطبقات " (١ / ٤٣٩) والطبراني (١٦٣٨) من طريقين عن عبد الله بن بريدة عن أبي الأسود عن أبي ذر عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، وقال الترمذي: " حديث حسن صحيح، وأبو الأسود الديلي اسمه ظالم ابن عمرو بن سفيان ". قلت: وهو ثقة من رجال الشيخين، وكذلك عبد الله بن بريدة، فهو صحيح على شرطهما، فالعجب من الحاكم كيف لم يخرجه. لا يقال: إنما لم يخرجه لأن كهمسا أرسله، فقال: عن عبد الله بن بريدة أنه بلغه أن رسول الله ﷺ قال: فذكره. أخرجه النسائي. لا يقال هذا لأن من مذهبه أن زيادة الثقة مقبولة ، وهو الصواب على تفصيل معروف في علم المصطلح، وقد رواه ثقتان عن عبد الله ابن بريدة موصولا مسندا كما تقدم، فهي زيادة مقبولة اتفاقا، لاسيما وله طريق أخرى عن أبي ذر يرويه أبو إسحاق عن ابن أبي ليلى عنه مرفوعا بلفظ:

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies