Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Al-Ḥākim said:

“This is an authentic hadith according to Muslim’s criteria.” Al-Dhahabī concurred.

I say: Muslim included Ibn Isḥāq only in a corroborating transmission. Moreover, he practiced tadlīs (concealing a weakness in the chain) and narrated this report using the ambiguous formula “from.” However, he explicitly stated that he had heard it in one of Aḥmad’s two versions, so its chain of transmission is good. The hadith master likewise said in Fatḥ al-Bārī (9/156), and stated in al-Talkhīṣ:

“Ibn al-Qaṭṭān declared it defective on account of Wāqid ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, saying, ‘The recognized name is Wāqid ibn ʿAmr.’”

I say: Al-Ḥākim’s version names him as Wāqid ibn ʿAmr, and the same is found in the versions of al-Shāfiʿī and ʿAbd al-Razzāq.

I would add: The same is true of all those whom we have mentioned, except Abū Dāwūd and Aḥmad in his other version, in which they both give the name as “Wāqid ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān.” This wording was reported only by ʿAbd al-Wāḥid ibn Ziyād, unlike those who give it as “Wāqid ibn ʿAmr”—and they are the more numerous. Their version is therefore preferable. Wāqid ibn ʿAmr is trustworthy and one of Muslim’s narrators, whereas Wāqid ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān is unknown. And Allah knows best.

The Jurisprudence of the Hadith:

The hadith clearly indicates the point for which we cited it, and this is further supported by its narrator’s acting upon it: the eminent Companion Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh, may Allah be pleased with him. Muḥammad ibn Maslamah did likewise, as we mentioned in the preceding hadith. These two reports are sufficient proof. It does not therefore harm us that some scholars restrict the hadith to looking only at the face and hands, because this limits the hadith without any qualifying text and sets aside the Companions’ understanding without proof—especially since it is further supported by the action of the rightly guided caliph ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb, may Allah be pleased with him. The hadith master said in al-Talkhīṣ (pp. 291–292):

A Benefit:

ʿAbd al-Razzāq and Saʿīd ibn Manṣūr recorded in his Sunan (520–

وقال الحاكم: " هذا حديث صحيح على شرط مسلم ". ووافقه الذهبي. قلت: ابن إسحاق إنما أخرج له مسلم متابعة، ثم هو مدلس وقد عنعنه، لكن قد صرح بالتحديث في إحدى روايتي أحمد، فإسناده حسن، وكذا قال الحافظ في " الفتح " (٩ / ١٥٦) ، وقال في " التلخيص ": " وأعله ابن القطان بواقد بن عبد الرحمن، وقال: المعروف واقد بن عمرو ". قلت: رواية الحاكم فيها عن واقد بن عمرو وكذا هو عند الشافعي وعبد الرزاق ". أقول: وكذلك هو عند جميع من ذكرنا غير أبي داود وأحمد في روايته الأخرى فقالا: " واقد بن عبد الرحمن "، وقد تفرد به عبد الواحد بن زياد خلافا لمن قال: " واقد بن عمرو " وهم أكثر، وروايتهم أولى، وواقد بن عمرو ثقة من رجال مسلم، أما واقد بن عبد الرحمن فمجهول. والله أعلم. فقه الحديث: والحديث ظاهر الدلالة لما ترجمنا له، وأيده عمل راويه به، وهو الصحابي الجليل جابر بن عبد الله ﵁، وقد صنع مثله محمد بن مسلمة كما ذكرناه في الحديث الذي قبله، وكفى بهما حجة، ولا يضرنا بعد ذلك، مذهب من قيد الحديث بالنظر إلى الوجه والكفين فقط، لأنه تقييد للحديث بدون نص مقيد، وتعطيل لفهم الصحابة بدون حجة، لاسيما وقد تأيد بفعل الخليفة الراشد عمر بن الخطاب ﵁، فقال الحافظ في " التلخيص " (ص ٢٩١ - ٢٩٢) : (فائدة) : روى عبد الرزاق وسعيد بن منصور في " سننه " (٥٢٠ -

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies