Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

I say: This is an authentic chain of transmission. All its narrators are trustworthy and meet Muslim’s criteria, apart from this al-Nadr. Abu al-Shaykh included a biographical notice on him without mentioning either criticism or accreditation. However, Ibn Abi Hatim said in al-Jarh wa-l-Taʿdil (4/1/481): “Al-Nadr ibn Hisham al-Isfahani narrated from al-Husayn ibn Hafs, ‘Amir ibn Ibrahim, and Bakr ibn Bakkar. I wrote from him in Isfahan, and he was truthful.”

The third: Mu‘adh ibn Mu‘adh al-‘Anbari, from Sufyan, with the same wording. Abu ‘Uthman al-Nujayrami reported it in al-Fawa’id (2/2/2) through the route of ‘Abd Allah ibn Hashim, who said: “Mu‘adh ibn Mu‘adh al-‘Anbari narrated to us,” with the same wording. He said: “‘Abd Allah ibn Hamid”—that is, his shaykh—“said: I asked ‘Abd Allah al-Sharqi”—that is, Ibn Hamid’s shaykh and the narrator from Ibn Hashim—“How did this hadith come to be narrated? He replied: ‘Abd Allah ibn Hashim lost his sight, so this hadith was prompted to him, and he accepted the prompting.’”

I say: ‘Abd Allah ibn Hashim was al-Tusi al-Naysaburi. He was trustworthy, one of Muslim’s narrators and shaykhs, and they unanimously declared him reliable. I have not seen any of the leading scholars accuse him of accepting prompted reports or of any other fault. (1) Thus, al-Sharqi’s charge against him on that count cannot be accepted, especially since al-Sharqi himself was subject to criticism, even though al-Sam‘ani described him as a hadith scholar of Nishapur. Al-Dhahabi included him in al-Mizan and said: “His transmissions from such scholars as al-Dhuhali and those of his rank are sound, but he was criticized for his habitual drinking of intoxicants.”

Ibn al-‘Imad related in al-Shadharat (2/313) that al-Hakim said: “I saw him, and he was unrivalled in his time in knowledge of medicine. He did not abandon drinking until he died, and his reliability was thereby impaired.” Al-Hafiz also mentioned in al-Lisan an anecdote about him that indicates either his ignorance of the Prophet’s saying concerning wine, “It is a disease, not a remedy,” peace and blessings be upon him, or his deliberate disregard of it. Otherwise, how could he instruct a sick person to drink well-aged wine? Allah’s help is sought.

(1) A good biographical notice of him is found in Tarikh Baghdad (10:193-194) and al-Tahdhib. End quote.
قلت: وهذا إسناد صحيح، رجاله كلهم ثقات على شرط مسلم غير النضر هذا، فقد ترجمه أبو الشيخ ولم يذكر فيه جرحا ولا تعديلا، لكن قال ابن أبي حاتم في " الجرح والتعديل " (٤ / ١ / ٤٨١) : " النضر بن هشام الأصبهاني، روى عن الحسين بن حفص وعامر بن إبراهيم وبكر بن بكار كتبت عنه بأصبهان وهو صدوق ". الثالث: معاذ بن معاذ العنبري عن سفيان به. أخرجه أبو عثمان النجيرمي في " الفوائد " (٢ / ٢ / ٢) من طريق عبد الله ابن هاشم حدثنا معاذ بن معاذ العنبري به. وقال: " قال عبد الله بن حامد (يعني شيخه) : قلت لعبد الله الشرقي (يعني شيخ بن حامد، والراوي عن ابن هاشم) : كيف وقع هذا الحديث؟ فقال: إن عبد الله بن هاشم كف بصره، فلقن هذا الحديث، فتلقن ".. قلت: عبد الله بن هاشم هو الطوسي النيسابوري، وهو ثقة من رجال مسلم وشيوخه وقد اتفقوا على توثيقه ولم أر أحدا من الأئمة رماه بالتلقن أو غيره، (١) فلا يقبل من الشرقي رمية إياه به، لاسيما وهو نفسه متكلم فيه وإن وصفه السمعاني بأنه محدث نيسابور، فقد أورده الذهبي في " الميزان " وقال: " وسماعاته صحيحة من مثل الذهلي وطبقته ولكن تكلموا فيه لإدمانه شرب المسكر ". وقد نقل ابن العماد في " الشذرات " (٢ / ٣١٣) عن الحاكم أنه قال: " رأيته، وكان أوحد وقته في معرفة الطب لم يدع الشراب إلى أن مات، فضعف بذلك ". وذكر الحافظ في " اللسان " عنه حكاية تدل على جهله بقوله ﷺ في الخمر: " إنها داء وليست بدواء " أو تجاهله إياه، وإلا فكيف يجوز أن يأمر المريض بأن يشرب الخمر المعتق! فالله المستعان.
(١) له ترجمة جيدة في " تاريخ بغداد " (١٠ / ١٩٣ / ١٩٤) و " التهذيب ". اهـ .

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies