Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Ibn Ḥibbān also said concerning him: “It is not permissible to cite him as evidence, because he contradicts the reliable narrators.”

I say: All the narrators above him in the chain are trustworthy. I found another chain for the hadith: al-Ṭabarānī recorded it in al-Kabīr, saying: Ibn Ḥanbal narrated to us; Muḥammad ibn Abān al-Wāsiṭī informed us; Abū Shihāb informed us, from Abū Muḥammad al-Jazarī—who was Ḥamzah al-Nuṣaybī—from ʿAmr ibn Dīnār, from Ibn ʿAbbās, attributed to the Prophet, blessings and peace be upon him, with its full wording. All its narrators are trustworthy except this Ḥamzah, namely Ḥamzah ibn Abī Ḥamzah al-Jazarī al-Nuṣaybī. In al-Taqrīb, it says of him: “Abandoned and accused of fabricating reports.”

I say: Al-Haythamī did not know him, for he said in al-Majmaʿ (5/212): “Al-Ṭabarānī recorded it, and it contains Abū Muḥammad al-Jazarī, Ḥamzah, whom I do not know; all its other narrators are among the narrators of the Ṣaḥīḥ collections!”

1021 — “Whoever assists in a dispute unjustly, or aids in wrongdoing, will remain under Allah’s wrath until he withdraws.”

Ibn Mājah recorded it (2/52) through Ḥusayn al-Muʿallim, from Maṭar al-Warrāq, from Nāfiʿ, from Ibn ʿUmar, attributed to the Prophet, blessings and peace be upon him. This is a good chain of transmission: all its narrators are trustworthy and are among Muslim’s narrators. I did not grade it authentic only because Maṭar al-Warrāq has been criticized with regard to his retention. Al-Taqrīb says of him: “Truthful, but frequently mistaken.”

I say: He was not alone in narrating it. Al-Ḥākim also recorded it (4/99) through ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Muslim, from Nāfiʿ, with the same wording. He said: “Its chain of transmission is authentic,” and al-Dhahabī agreed with him.

I say: This judgment has an evident flaw, for al-Taqrīb says of ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Muslim: “Truthful, but makes many errors; he transmits mursal reports and practices concealed transmission.” Al-Muthannā ibn Zayd, who is unknown, also narrated it from Maṭar. Abū Dāwūd recorded it with similar wording.

وقد قال ابن حبان فيه: " لا يجوز أن يحتج به لمخالفته الأثبات ". قلت: ومن فوقه من الرواة كلهم ثقات. وقد وجدت للحديث طريقا آخر، رواه الطبراني في " الكبير " قال: حدثنا ابن حنبل أخبرنا محمد بن أبان الواسطي أخبرنا أبو شهاب عن أبي محمد الجزري - وهو حمزة النصيبي - عن عمرو بن دينار عن ابن عباس مرفوعا بتمامه. ورجاله كلهم ثقات غير حمزة هذا وهو حمزة بن أبي حمزة الجزري النصيبي قال في " التقريب ": " متروك متهم بالوضع ". قلت: ولم يعرفه شيخه الهيثمي حيث قال في " المجمع " (٥ / ٢١٢) : " رواه الطبراني وفيه أبو محمد الجزري حمزة ولم أعرفه وبقية رجاله رجال الصحيح "!. ١٠٢١ - " من أعان على خصومة بظلم، أو يعين على ظلم، لم يزل في سخط الله حتى ينزع ". أخرجه ابن ماجة (٢ / ٥٢) من طريق حسين المعلم عن مطر الوراق عن نافع عن ابن عمر مرفوعا. وهذا سند حسن رجاله كلهم ثقات رجال مسلم، وإنما لم أصححه لأن في مطر الوراق كلاما من جهة حفظه، وقد قال في " التقريب ": " صدوق كثير الخطأ ". قلت: ولم يتفرد به، فقد أخرجه الحاكم (٤ / ٩٩) من طريق عطاء بن أبي مسلم عن نافع به. وقال: " صحيح الإسناد ". ووافقه الذهبي. قلت: وفيه نظر بين، فإن عطاء بن أبي مسلم قال في " التقريب ": " صدوق يهم كثيرا ويرسل ويدلس ". وقد رواه عن مطر أيضا المثنى بن زيد وهو مجهول، أخرجه أبو داود بنحوه.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies