(2/905/9), from Salamah ibn Ṣafwān ibn Salamah al-Zuraqī, from Yazīd ibn Ṭalḥah ibn Rukānah, who attributed it to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and mentioned the report. This does not detract from the former, since it is a different chain of transmission and is mursal; rather, it is an unobjectionable supporting witness for the connected report. Ibn Abī Ḥātim gave a biographical notice for Yazīd ibn Ṭalḥah (4/2/273) but mentioned neither criticism nor accreditation concerning him. Al-Suyūṭī, however, said in Isʿāf al-Mubaṭṭaʾ: “He was a Companion.”
The second: from Suwayd ibn Saʿīd: Ṣāliḥ ibn Mūsā al-Ṭalḥī narrated to us; Qatādah narrated to us, from Anas, with the same report. Ibn Bishrān recorded it in al-Amālī (155/1).
I say: This chain is very weak. Ṣāliḥ ibn Mūsā al-Ṭalḥī is abandoned, as stated in al-Taqrīb. Suwayd ibn Saʿīd is weak, and Ibn Maʿīn spoke of him in particularly severe terms.
- As for the hadith of Ibn ʿAbbās, Saʿīd ibn Muḥammad al-Warrāq narrated it: Ṣāliḥ ibn Ḥassān narrated to us, from Muḥammad ibn Kaʿb, from him, attributing it to the Prophet, with the same report. It was recorded by al-Kharāʾiṭī; al-ʿUqaylī in al-Ḍuʿafāʾ (187); Ibn ʿAdī in al-Kāmil (198/1); and Abū Nuʿaym in al-Ḥilyah (3/220). Al-ʿUqaylī said: “Regarding Ṣāliḥ ibn Ḥassān, al-Bukhārī said: ‘His hadith is rejected.’ This report also has another route, though it contains some weakness.”