Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

Ibrāhīm ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿArʿarah informed us: Muʿādh ibn Hishām said: “I found in my father’s book … the hadith.”

I say: This is an authentic chain of transmission; its narrators are trustworthy and are among Muslim’s narrators. Abū Ḥassān was al-Aʿraj al-Baṣrī, better known by his appellation; his name was Muslim ibn ʿAbd Allāh. An objection has been raised against this hadith, but on grounds that do not impair it. Al-Khaṭīb related in History (6/149), on the authority of al-Athram, who said:

“I said to Abū ʿAbd Allāh—that is, Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal—‘Do you know a narration from Qatādah, from Abū Ḥassān …?’” He then mentioned the hadith. “He replied, ‘They copied it from Muʿādh’s book and did not hear it from him.’

“I said, ‘There is a man here who claims that he heard it from Muʿādh.’ He rejected this and asked, ‘Who is he?’ I replied, ‘Ibrāhīm ibn ʿArʿarah.’ His expression changed, and he waved his hand, saying, ‘Lies and falsehood! Glory be to Allah! They did not hear it from him. Rather, so-and-so merely said: “We copied it from his book, but did not hear it from him.” Glory be to Allah!’” He considered this a grave matter on his part.

Perhaps Imam Aḥmad, in saying, “So-and-so …,” was referring to ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī. For al-Khaṭīb transmitted it through Ismāʿīl al-Qāḍī, from him, that he said: “Qatādah narrated a singular hadith that is not known from any of Qatādah’s students except through Hishām’s narration. I copied it from the book of his son, Muʿādh ibn Hishām, while he was present, but I did not hear it from him as a narration from Qatādah. Muʿādh said to me, ‘Bring it here so that I may read it.’ I said, ‘Leave it for today.’ It states: ‘Abū Ḥassān narrated to us …’” He then mentioned it. ʿAlī ibn al-Madīnī said: “This is how it appears in the book.”

Al-Khaṭīb then commented: “What prevents Ibrāhīm ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿArʿarah from having heard this hadith from Muʿādh, along with other material that he heard from him? Ibn Abī Ḥātim al-Rāzī said in his book Narrator Criticism and Accreditation that his father was asked about Ibrāhīm ibn ʿArʿarah, and he replied: ‘Truthful.’” Al-Khaṭīb then related from Ibn Maʿīn that he said: “He was trustworthy and well known for hadith. Yaḥyā ibn Saʿīd used to honor him. He was well known for pursuing hadith and meticulous with books, but he compromised himself by involving himself in every

إبراهيم بن محمد بن عرعرة: أنبأنا معاذ بن هشام قال: وجدت في كتاب أبي ... الحديث. قلت: وهذا إسناد صحيح رجاله ثقات رجال مسلم. وأبو حسان هو الأعرج البصري مشهور بكنيته واسمه مسلم بن عبد الله. وقد أعل الحديث بما لا يقدح، فقد روى الخطيب في " التاريخ " (٦ / ١٤٩) عن الأثرم قال: قلت: لأبي عبد الله - يعني أحمد بن حنبل - تحفظ عن قتادة عن أبي حسان ... (فذكر الحديث) . فقال: كتبوه من كتاب معاذ ولم يسمعوه. قلت: ها هنا إنسان يزعم أنه قد سمعه من معاذ، فأنكر ذلك، قال: من هو؟ قلت : إبراهيم بن عرعرة. فتغير وجهه ونفض يده وقال: كذب وزور، سبحان الله! ما سمعوه منه إنما قال فلان: كتبناه من كتابه ولم يسمعه منه، سبحان الله! واستعظم ذلك منه. ولعل الإمام أحمد يشير بقوله " فلان ... " إلى علي بن المديني، فقد أخرجه الخطيب من طريق إسماعيل القاضي عنه قال: روى قتادة حديثا غريبا لا يحفظ عن أحد من أصحاب قتادة إلا من حديث هشام، فنسخته من كتاب ابنه معاذ بن هشام وهو حاضر لم أسمعه منه عن قتادة، وقال لي معاذ: هاته حتى أقرأه، قلت: دعه اليوم - قال: حدثنا أبو حسان (فذكره) قال علي بن المديني : هكذا هو في الكتاب. وعقب الخطيب على ذلك بقوله: " وما الذي يمنع أن يكون إبراهيم بن محمد بن عرعرة سمع هذا الحديث من معاذ مع سماعه منه غيره، وقد قال ابن أبي حاتم الرازي في كتاب " الجرح والتعديل ": سئل أبي عن إبراهيم بن عرعرة؟ فقال: " صدوق ". ثم روى الخطيب عن ابن معين أنه قال: ثقة معروف بالحديث كان يحيى بن سعيد يكرمه مشهور بالطلب، كيس الكتاب ولكنه يفسد نفسه يدخل في كل

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies