Silsilat al-Ahadith al-SahihahNasir al-Din al-Albani

It was transmitted by al-Ṭaḥāwī and al-Ḥākim, and from the latter by al-Bayhaqī, who deemed it weak, saying: “Salamah ibn al-Faḍl al-Abrash narrates objectionable reports.”

I say: Al-Ḥāfiẓ said: “He is truthful but makes many errors.” It also has another hidden defect: Ibn Isḥāq narrates it using the ambiguous ‘from’ formula, while he practised tadlīs. Yet al-Ḥākim said: “It is authentic according to the criteria of Muslim”! Al-Dhahabī rebutted him, saying: “That is what he said, but Muslim did not rely on Salamah. Though he was deemed trustworthy, Ibn Rāhawayh declared him weak.”

I say: Likewise, Muslim did not rely on Ibn Isḥāq; rather, he narrated from him only as corroboration, despite the fact that he practised tadlīs and narrated it using the ambiguous ‘from’ formula. Imam al-Ṭaḥāwī said thereafter: “Thus, from the hadith of ʿĀʾishah, may Allah be pleased with her, it has become clear to us that the saying of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, which Abū Hurayrah narrated from him—‘The child born of fornication is the worst of the three’—was only about a particular person whose harm to the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, was such as made him a disbeliever, worse than his mother and than the fornicator by whom she had conceived him. We ask Allah Most High to grant us success.”

I say: However, the chain of transmission of her hadith contains the weakness already noted, and this prevents the hadith from being interpreted by it. The preferable course is to interpret it in accordance with Sufyān’s statement, which is supported by two hadiths attributed to the Prophet, even if they are weak—unless someone finds evidence stronger than this, in which case it should be adopted. Ibn al-Qayyim’s words in his epistle al-Manār, may Allah have mercy on him, suggest that he inclined towards this interpretation, since its implication is that the hadith is not general in application. For he mentioned the hadith, “No child born of fornication shall enter Paradise,” and related Ibn al-Jawzī’s statement that it conflicts with the verse: “No bearer of burdens shall bear ...”

أخرجه الطحاوي والحاكم وعنه البيهقي وضعفه بقوله: " سلمة بن الفضل الأبرش يروي مناكير ". قلت: وقال الحافظ: " صدوق كثير الخطأ ". وفيه علة أخرى وهي عنعنة ابن إسحاق فإنه مدلس، ومع ذلك فقد قال الحاكم: " صحيح على شرط مسلم ".! ورده الذهبي بقوله: " كذا قال، وسلمة لم يحتج به (م) وقد وثق، وضعفه ابن راهويه ". قلت: وكذلك ابن إسحاق لم يحتج به مسلم، وإنما روى له متابعة على أنه مدلس وقد عنعنه. قال الإمام الطحاوي عقبه: " فبان لنا بحديث عائشة ﵂ أن قول رسول الله ﷺ الذي ذكره عنه أبو هريرة: " ولد الزنا شر الثلاثة " إنما كان لإنسان بعينه كان منه من الأذى لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ما كان منه مما صار به كافرا شرا من أمه، ومن الزاني الذي كان حملها به منه. والله تعالى نسأله التوفيق. قلت: ولكن في إسناد حديثها ما علمت من الضعف وذلك يمنع من تفسير الحديث به. فالأولى تفسيره بقول سفيان المؤيد بحديثين مرفوعين، ولو كانا ضعيفين إلا أن يبدو لأحد ما هو أقوى منه، فيصار حينئذ إليه. ويبدو من كلام ابن القيم رحمه الله في رسالته " المنار "، أنه جنح إلى هذا التفسير، لأن مؤداه إلى أن الحديث ليس على عمومه، فقد ذكر حديث " لا يدخل الجنة ولد زنا "، وحكى قول ابن الجوزي أنه معارض لآية * (ولا تزر وازرة ... ) *

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies