Minhaj as-SunnahIbn Taimiya

to the angels, to Moses, and to His creation on the Day of Resurrection would amount to nothing more than creating in them a perception (1) of that which, being eternal, has always existed. It is well known that the revealed texts indicate the contrary.

Nor do we say that He became one who speaks after not having been one, for this would describe Him (2) as possessing perfection after deficiency and as having become a locus for newly occurring things through which He became perfect after having been deficient. Moreover, the origination of that perfection (3) must have a cause. [The same must be said of the second as of the first; thus, this entails the arising of (* a perfection without a cause] (4), as well as a description of Him as perpetually deficient from pre-eternity until something arose for Him for whose arising (5) there was no cause. This strips Him of the attributes of perfection.

As for the continuous occurrence of events, what this means [here] (6) is His always being one who speaks (7) whenever He wills. This is the perpetuity of His perfection and His attributes *) (8) of majesty, as well as the perpetuity of His acts. On this basis, the world can come into being; everything within it is created by Him and originated (9) after not having existed. This is because the cause of origination is what subsists in Him—such as His words, His acts (10), and other things. It is thus intelligible

(1) (ب), (ا), (ن), and (م) read: “perception.” (2) (ب) reads: “for it is a description of Him”; (أ): “for if it is ascribed to Him” (“this” is omitted). “Of Him” is absent from (ع). (3) (ع) reads: “speech.” (4) The text in square brackets is absent from (ن) and (م). (5) (ن) and (م) read: “until something arose, although there is no cause for anything of its kind”; this is a corruption. (6) The word “here” is absent from (ن) and (م). (7) (ن) reads: “one who addresses others.” (8) The text between the asterisks is absent from (أ) and (ب). (9) (ب) alone reads: “created by Him and originated,” with both words in the accusative. The reading in the remaining manuscripts is correct. In the phrase “On this basis, the world can come into being,” the verb *yakūnu* (“come into being”) is complete—that is, it is not functioning as a copula. (10) (ب) and (ا) read: “because it comes into being through the cause of origination, namely His words and acts that subsist in His essence”; this is an error. (ن) and (م) read: “because the cause of newly occurring things is His words and acts that subsist in Him.”
لِلْمَلَائِكَةِ وَلِمُوسَى وَلِخَلْقِهِ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ لَيْسَ إِلَّا مُجَرَّدَ خَلْقِ إِدْرَاكٍ (١) لَهُمْ لَمَّا كَانَ أَزَلِيًّا لَمْ يَزَلْ. وَمَعْلُومٌ أَنَّ النُّصُوصَ دَلَّتْ عَلَى ضِدِّ ذَلِكَ، وَلَا نَقُولُ إِنَّهُ صَارَ مُتَكَلِّمًا بَعْدَ أَنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ مُتَكَلِّمًا، فَإِنَّ هَذَا وَصْفٌ لَهُ (٢) بِالْكَمَالِ بَعْدَ النَّقْصِ، وَأَنَّهُ صَارَ مَحَلًّا لِلْحَوَادِثِ الَّتِي كَمُلَ بِهَا بَعْدَ نَقْصِهِ. ثُمَّ حُدُوثُ ذَلِكَ الْكَمَالِ (٣) لَا بُدَّ لَهُ مِنْ سَبَبٍ، [وَالْقَوْلُ فِي الثَّانِي كَالْقَوْلِ فِي الْأَوَّلِ فَفِيهِ تَجَدُّدُ (* كَمَالٍ بِلَا سَبَبٍ] (٤) ، وَوَصْفٌ لَهُ بِالنَّقْصِ الدَّائِمِ مِنَ الْأَزَلِ إِلَى أَنَّ تَجَدَّدَ لَهُ مَا لَا سَبَبَ لِتَجَدُّدِهِ (٥) ، وَفِي ذَلِكَ تَعْطِيلٌ لَهُ عَنْ صِفَاتِ الْكَمَالِ. وَأَمَّا دَوَامُ الْحَوَادِثِ فَمَعْنَاهُ [هُنَا] (٦) دَوَامُ كَوْنِهِ مُتَكَلِّمًا (٧) إِذَا شَاءَ، وَهَذَا دَوَامُ كَمَالِهِ وَنُعُوتُ *) (٨) جَلَالِهِ وَدَوَامُ أَفْعَالِهِ، وَبِهَذَا يُمْكِنُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْعَالَمُ، وَكُلُّ مَا فِيهِ مَخْلُوقٌ لَهُ حَادِثٌ (٩) بَعْدَ أَنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ، لِأَنَّهُ يَكُونُ سَبَبُ الْحُدُوثِ هُوَ مَا قَامَ بِذَاتِهِ مِنْ كَلِمَاتِهِ وَأَفْعَالِهِ (١٠) وَغَيْرِ ذَلِكَ، فَيُعْقَلُ
(١) ب، ا، ن، م: الْإِدْرَاكُ. (٢) ب: فَإِنَّهُ وَصْفٌ لَهُ ; أ: فَإِنْ وُصِفَ لَهُ (بِسُقُوطِ: هَذَا) . وَسَقَطَتْ " لَهُ " مِنْ (ع) . (٣) ع: الْكَلَامِ. (٤) مَا بَيْنَ الْمَعْقُوفَتَيْنِ سَاقِطٌ مِنْ (ن) ، (م) . (٥) ن، م: إِلَى تَجَدُّدِ مَا لَا سَبَبَ لِنَحْوِهِ، وَهُوَ تَحْرِيفٌ. (٦) هُنَا: سَاقِطَةٌ مِنْ (ن) ، (م) . (٧) ن: مُكَلِّمًا. (٨) مَا بَيْنَ النَّجْمَتَيْنِ سَاقِطٌ مِنْ (أ) ، (ب) . (٩) ب (فَقَطْ) : مَخْلُوقًا لَهُ حَادِثًا. وَالَّذِي فِي بَاقِي النُّسَخِ صَوَابٌ، وَفِي عِبَارَةِ " وَبِهَذَا يُمْكِنُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْعَالَمُ " الْفِعْلُ " يَكُونُ " تَامٌّ. (١٠) ب، ا: لِأَنَّهُ يَكُونُ بِسَبَبِ الْحُدُوثِ وَهُوَ مَا قَامَ بِذَاتِهِ مِنْ كَلِمَاتِهِ وَأَفْعَالِهِ، وَهُوَ خَطَأٌ ; ن، م: لِأَنَّهُ يَكُونُ سَبَبُ الْحَوَادِثِ هُوَ مَا قَامَ بِهِ مِنْ كَلِمَاتِهِ وَأَفْعَالِهِ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies