Accordingly, whoever says:
“A speaker is one whose speech is separate from him, [and one who wills, loves, hates, is pleased, or is displeased is one whose will, love, hatred, pleasure, and displeasure are separate from him and do not subsist in him in any respect whatsoever] (1),”
has made an unintelligible claim. Nor did the Messengers convey this understanding to people. Rather, everyone who hears what the Messengers conveyed from Allah knows necessarily that, by Allah’s speech, the Messengers did not mean something separate [from Allah. Likewise, by His will, love, pleasure, and the like, they did not mean something separate] (2) from Him (3), but rather what (4) He is characterized by.
The Jahmiyya and the Mu'tazila (5) said: “A speaker is one who produces speech. When Allah [Most High] (6) originated speech in something other than Himself, He became a speaker.”
In reply, it is said to them: The later scholars who differed on this matter held three views (7).
It was said: “A speaker is one who produces speech, even if that speech is separate from him.” [This was said only by these people] (8).
And it was said: “A speaker is one in whom speech subsists, even if it does not result from his own act (9), nor [does it occur] through his will, and [not] through his power (10).” This is the view of the Kullābiyya, the Sālimiyya, and those who agreed with them.