(1) faith, goodness, and loyalty to Allah, and that whoever believes in the existence of these persons is more perfect [and nobler](2), and superior in Allah’s sight to one who does not believe in their existence. This position is not identical in every respect to that of the Rāfidis; rather, it resembles it in some respects, since its proponents have made the perfection of religion contingent upon this belief.
The response, then, is this:
This position is likewise false by the consensus of Muslim scholars and leading authorities. Knowing the obligatory and recommended acts, and performing all of them, does not depend upon believing in the existence of any one of(3) these persons. Any devout worshipper, ascetic, or ordinary person who supposes that any part of religion—whether obligatory or recommended—depends(4) upon believing in their existence is(5), by the consensus of the people of knowledge and faith who know the Book and the Sunnah, ignorant and astray. For it is known as a matter of necessity in Islam that the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—did not prescribe for his nation belief in the existence of these persons, nor did his Companions regard it as part of religion, [nor did the leading Muslim scholars.
Moreover, none of these designations—the terms al-ghawth (the succor), al-qutb (the pole), al-awtād (the pegs), al-nujabā’ (the nobles)(6), and others—has been transmitted by anyone from the Prophet—peace and blessings be upon him—with a recognized chain of transmission as something that he