and others (1). When this approach is followed with them, it proves useful regarding the points at issue, and the matter becomes clear to them (2). Every group possesses some truth and some falsehood. When it is addressed, it is shown: “The truth to which we call you (3) has a greater claim to acceptance than that upon which we agree with you. The prophethood (4) of Muhammad—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—has a greater claim to acceptance than the prophethood of Moses and Jesus [peace be upon them both] (5), and the caliphate of Abū Bakr and Umar has a greater claim to validity (6) than the caliphate of Alī.
“For every sound line of proof [that has been cited] (7) by which the prophethood of this one [and that one] (8) is established, that same proof establishes [thereby] (9) the prophethood of Muhammad—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—a fortiori. (10 Nor is there any sound line of proof by which the caliphate of Alī is established without its establishing the caliphate of these two a fortiori 10) (10).”
One also explains (11) to them that whatever they use to reject this truth may also be used to reject the truth (12) they possess. Thus, nothing (13) impugns (* the points under dispute without also constituting an attack (14) upon the points of consensus; and there is nothing by which the points of consensus are established that does not also establish thereby (15) the points under dispute *) (16). Nor can any objection be raised against the prophethood of Muhammad [may blessings