wisdom, according to the majority, or solely because of volition and will, according to those affirmers of predestination who deny both the grounding of His acts in reasons and will. Thus, if some acts are fitting for Him that would not be fitting for human beings, the analogy between Him and His creation is invalid. It follows all the more necessarily that punishing a wrongdoer—something fitting for us—cannot be deemed unfitting for Him. For He has a greater claim to be exalted above every imperfection from which others are declared free, and praise belongs to Him to a degree deserved by no one else] (1).
[Commentary on the statement, “and that His acts are perfectly ordered and occur for a purpose and benefit”]
As for his statement (2): “And that (3) His acts are perfectly ordered and occur (4) for a purpose and benefit (5); otherwise, He would be acting frivolously.”
It has already been explained that those among Ahl al-Sunnah (6) who are not Imāmīs hold two views concerning whether the acts and rulings of Allah [Most High] (7) are grounded in reasons, and that the majority affirm such grounding (8). Is the wisdom separate from the Lord [and does not subsist in Him] (9), or does it subsist in Him while wise purposes external to Him are also affirmed? [They hold two views on this] (10). And do (11) these wise purposes form an infinite series, or do they not? Or does their succession extend into the future but not into the past? There are several views on this [among them] (12).