many of the Muʿtazila, and the Karrāmiyya. It is also the position of the Kullābiyya—the leading authorities among the Ashʿarīs—according to the account of Abū ʿAlī al-Thaqafī and others. In agreement with the Karrāmiyya’s position,
“They affirmed for Allah an act subsisting in His essence, distinct from what is effected, just as they affirmed for Him an eternal will subsisting in His essence” (1).
He also related the rest of the creed they had composed when a dispute arose between them and Ibn Khuzayma concerning the Quran. However, I do not know whether this was the position of Ibn Kullāb himself or whether they stated it on the basis of this principle, which was well established among them.] (2)
[The Positions of the Rāfida on the Creation of the Servants’ Acts]
Divine decree itself is a subject of dispute among the Imāmiyya, just as they disagree over the divine attributes.
Abū al-Hasan al-Ashʿarī (3) \ 110 said:
“The Rāfida differed concerning the servants’ acts (4): Are they created?
N: created by Allah Most High; M: created by Allah. They are (5) three groups:
The first group [among them] is Hishām ibn al-Hakam (6):”