Since that is so, it has become clear that this Imāmī and others like him among the later Imāmiyyah, the Mu'tazilah, and those who agree with them have no proof (1) grounded in reason for declaring false the position of their brethren among the earlier Imāmiyyah and those who agreed with them (2 who disputed with the later scholars over questions concerning the divine attributes, the Quran, and related matters 2) (2). How, then, would they fare (3) against Ahl al-Sunnah, who are sounder in both reason and transmitted evidence?! (4)
[Response to his claim that the Imāmiyyah say that Allah has power over all things subject to power]
(Chapter)
As for his statement concerning the Imāmiyyah—that they say (5)—this is ambiguous (6) and serves no purpose. (7)
[For the statement, “He has power over all things subject to power,” can have two meanings. The first is that He has power over everything possible, since every possible thing is subject to power, in the sense that an agent possessing power can bring it about.