This, then, is the debate between these Imāmīs and Karrāmīs, on the one hand, and those Imāmīs and those among the Mu'tazila [and Kullābiyya] (1) who agree with them, together with their followers (2), on the other, concerning these matters in which they rely upon reason (3). A group of the Mu'tazila and the Shī'a (4), along with those who agree with them, responded that the proof [indicating] (5) the temporal origination of the world is this very proof indicating the temporal origination of bodies. If this proof is not sound, the way to knowing (6) the temporal origination of the world and affirming the Maker (7) is blocked.
Their opponent said (8): “We do not concede that this is the way to know (9) the temporal origination of the world or to affirm the Maker. Rather, this is a method newly introduced into Islam. None of the Companions, the Prophet’s kin (10), or the Successors followed this method (11). It was followed only by Jahm ibn Safwān, Abū al-Hudhayl al-'Allāf, and those who agreed with them. If knowledge affirming the Maker and the temporal origination of the world (12) could be attained only through this method, explaining it would have been part of the religion, and faith could have been attained only through it.
“We know with certainty that the Prophet—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—did not mention this method to his nation, nor did he call them by means of it or to it (13); nor did any of the Companions. Thus, the claim that (14) faith depends upon it is necessarily known to be false from the religion of Islam,”