people, is a privation; and we adopt the view that it is a privation, so it may cease. Even if it is something positive, we do not concede that it cannot cease.
[If] the one who denies corporeality said (1):
“Rest is [something positive], and if it is (2) something positive and pre-eternal, then that which necessitates (3) its pre-eternity is pre-eternal and is among the concomitants of the Necessary Existent. It is thus necessary by virtue of the necessity of its cause (4).”
His corporealist brethren replied:
“This point furnishes a rebuttal to all the sects that dispute with us (5)—the Shi'ites, Mu'tazilites, Ash'arites, and others—for they agree with us that the Creator acted after He had not been acting. It therefore follows that [all] (6) temporal events may occur without (7) a temporally originated cause. [They explicitly state that all temporal events may—indeed, must (8)—occur without (9) a temporally originated cause] (10) (11 because they deem a beginningless succession of temporal events impossible 11) (11). Since this is possible, we adopt (12) the view that rest is a privation, while what is temporally originated is (13) motion, which is something positive. If a body may be brought into existence without a temporally originated cause, then a fortiori motion may be brought into existence without a temporally originated cause.
“Even if it were said:
‘Rest is something positive; then, if concrete entities may come into existence after not having existed,