(1) A and B read: “The Sibābiyyah, the followers of Abd al-Rahmān ibn Sibābah”; N and M read: “The Sābiyyah, the followers of Abd al-Rahmān ibn Sābiyah.” *Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn* (Egyptian Nahdah edition, edited by Shaykh Muhammad Muhyī al-Dīn Abd al-Hamīd) reads: “The Sibābiyyah, the followers of Abd al-Rahmān ibn Sibābah.” *Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn*, 1/136 (Istanbul edition, edited by H. Ritter), reads: “The Siyābiyyah, the followers of Abd al-Rahmān ibn Siyābah,” which is correct. His name likewise appears in this form in his biographical entries in al-Kashshī’s *al-Rijāl*, p. 247, and al-Māmaqānī’s *Tanqīh al-Maqāl*, 2/144–145. He is also listed in *Rijāl al-Tūsī*, p. 230, among the companions of Ja‘far al-Sādiq: “Abd al-Rahmān ibn Siyābah al-Kūfī al-Bajalī, the cloth merchant, a client from whom reports were transmitted.” (2) “Whatever it may be” is omitted from N alone. (3) *Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn* reads: “they deem [it] correct.” (4) M reads “names,” which is a corruption. (5) *Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn* reads: “They maintain that Allah, Mighty and Majestic, cannot be described as having always…” N and M read: “They maintain that Allah cannot be described that Allah has always…” The text printed here follows A and B. (6) M, B, N, and A read “Lord.” I judged the correct reading to be the one I printed on the authority of (M). (7) N reads “not that,” which is an error. (8) N and M read “and not.” (9) “Not” is omitted from M. (10) “Of nothing” is omitted from N alone. (11) N alone reads: “He said: All the Rāfidah…” (12) B reads “a thing.”