Accordingly, it may be said: Even if we grant that you call this “composition” (1), you have no proof for denying it. It was from this standpoint that Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī argued against them in The Incoherence.
Likewise, the term “part” may mean one of the components from which a thing is composed, such as the components of composite foods, plants, and buildings (2); or a part that can [be separated] (3) from it, such as a human limb. It may also mean an attribute inherent in a thing, such as animality in an animal, humanity in a human being, and rationality in a rational being.
It may further mean a part that cannot be divided, such as a constituent of a body that cannot be separated from it: either the indivisible atom, or matter and form according to those who affirm them [and say that it] (4) exists only when the body exists; or something else according to those who do not hold this view.
People disagree concerning the body: Is it composed of matter and form, of indivisible atoms, or of neither the one [nor the other] (5)? There are three positions. Most rational thinkers hold the third position, including the Hishāmiyya, Najjāriyya, Dirāriyya, Kullābiyya, [and Ashariyya] (6), as well as many of the Karrāmiyya and many jurists, hadith scholars, Sufis, philosophers, and others.
The point here is that the term “part” (7) has several meanings depending upon—