Minhaj as-SunnahIbn Taimiya

and paraded among the clans and tribes, while it is proclaimed: ‘This is the punishment of one who abandoned the Book and the sunnah and turned to speculative theology.’” (1); and Ahmad ibn Hanbal said, “The scholars of speculative theology are heretics” (2), and, “No one ever donned the garb of speculative theology and prospered” (3)—along with other statements of this kind.

The fact remains that the doctrine that bodies are composed of indivisible atoms is not known to have been held by any of the Muslim imams—neither the Companions, nor those who followed them in righteousness, nor any of the renowned imams who came after them.

Rather, those who hold this doctrine maintain that, ever since Allah Most High created the indivisible atoms, He has created nothing that exists in itself: neither heaven nor earth, neither animal nor plant, neither mineral nor human being nor anything else. Instead, He merely brings about new combinations of those already-existing atoms, joining and separating them. Thus, He originates only accidents subsisting in those atoms, not entities subsisting in themselves.

They therefore maintain that when He creates clouds, rain, human beings, other animals, trees, plants, and fruits, He does not create any entity that subsists in itself; He creates only accidents that subsist in something else. This contradicts what is established by revelation, reason, and direct observation. The existence of indivisible atoms in isolation from bodies is known to be false by reason and sense perception—let alone the claim that the only entities subsisting in themselves that Allah Most High ever created are those atoms. And these people—

(1) This statement appears in the preceding reference, p. [0–9]5, but its wording there is: “They should be beaten with palm branches and made to ride on camels.” (2) This statement appears in *Sawn al-Mantiq*, p. 150, quoted from Abū al-Muzaffar ibn al-Samānī’s *al-Intisār li-Ahl al-Hadīth*. Its wording there, however, is: “The leading authorities of speculative theology are heretics.” (3) Al-Suyūtī quotes a similar statement from Ibn Abd al-Barr’s *Jāmi Bayān al-Ilm*: “Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: ‘A practitioner of speculative theology will never prosper.’” See *Sawn al-Mantiq*, p. [0–9]36; *Jāmi Bayān al-Ilm*, 2:95.
وَيُطَافُ بِهِمْ فِي الْعَشَائِرِ وَالْقَبَائِلِ، وَيُقَالُ: هَذَا جَزَاءُ مَنْ تَرَكَ الْكِتَابَ وَالسُّنَّةَ، وَأَقْبَلَ عَلَى الْكَلَامِ (١) وَكَقَوْلِ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ حَنْبَلٍ: عُلَمَاءُ الْكَلَامِ زَنَادِقَةٌ (٢) ، وَقَوْلُهُ: مَا ارْتَدَى أَحَدٌ بِالْكَلَامِ فَأَفْلَحُ (٣) ، وَأَمْثَالَ ذَلِكَ. وَإِلَّا فَالْقَوْلُ بِأَنَّ الْأَجْسَامَ مُرَكَّبَةٌ مِنَ الْجَوَاهِرِ الْمُنْفَرِدَةِ قَوْلٌ لَا يُعْرَفُ عَنْ أَحَدٍ مِنْ أَئِمَّةِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ، لَا مِنَ الصَّحَابَةِ وَلَا التَّابِعِينَ لَهُمْ بِإِحْسَانٍ، وَلَا مَنْ بَعْدَهُمْ مِنَ الْأَئِمَّةِ الْمَعْرُوفِينَ، بَلِ الْقَائِلُونَ بِذَلِكَ يَقُولُونَ: إِنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى لَمْ يَخْلُقْ مُنْذُ خَلَقَ الْجَوَاهِرَ الْمُنْفَرِدَةَ شَيْئًا قَائِمًا بِنَفْسِهِ، لَا سَمَاءً وَلَا أَرْضًا، وَلَا حَيَوَانًا وَلَا نَبَاتًا، وَلَا مَعَادِنَ، وَلَا إِنْسَانًا وَلَا غَيْرَ إِنْسَانٍ، بَلْ إِنَّمَا يُحْدِثُ تَرْكِيبَ تِلْكَ الْجَوَاهِرِ الْقَدِيمَةِ فَيَجْمَعُهَا وَيُفَرِّقُهَا، فَإِنَّمَا يُحْدِثُ أَعْرَاضًا قَائِمَةً بِتِلْكَ الْجَوَاهِرِ، لَا أَعْيَانًا قَائِمَةً بِأَنْفُسِهَا. فَيَقُولُونَ: إِنَّهُ إِذَا خَلَقَ السَّحَابَ وَالْمَطَرَ وَالْإِنْسَانَ، وَغَيْرَهُ مِنَ الْحَيَوَانِ وَالْأَشْجَارِ وَالنَّبَاتِ وَالثِّمَارِ، لَمْ يَخْلُقْ عَيْنًا قَائِمَةً بِنَفْسِهَا، وَإِنَّمَا خَلَقَ أَعْرَاضًا قَائِمَةً بِغَيْرِهَا. وَهَذَا خِلَافُ مَا دَلَّ عَلَيْهِ السَّمْعُ وَالْعَقْلُ وَالْعِيَانُ، وَوُجُودُ جَوَاهِرَ لَا تَقْبَلُ الْقِسْمَةَ مُنْفَرِدَةً عَنِ الْأَجْسَامِ مِمَّا يُعْلَمُ بُطْلَانُهُ بِالْعَقْلِ وَالْحِسِّ، فَضْلًا عَنْ أَنْ يَكُونَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى لَمْ يَخْلُقْ عَيْنًا قَائِمَةً بِنَفْسِهَا إِلَّا ذَلِكَ، وَهَؤُلَاءِ
(١) وَرَدَ هَذَا الْكَلَامُ فِي الْمَرْجِعِ السَّابِقِ، ص [٠ - ٩] ٥، وَلَكِنَّ فِيهِ: أَنْ يُضْرَبُوا بِالْجَرِيدِ وَيُحْمَلُوا عَلَى الْإِبِلِ. (٢) وَرَدَتْ هَذِهِ الْعِبَارَةُ فِي " صَوْنِ الْمَنْطِقِ "، ص ١٥٠، نَقْلًا عَنْ كِتَابِ " الِانْتِصَارِ لِأَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ " لِأَبِي الْمُظَفَّرِ بْنِ السَّمْعَانِيِّ وَلَكِنَّ نَصَّهَا: أَئِمَّةُ الْكَلَامِ زَنَادِقَةٌ. (٣) نَقْلَ السُّيُوطِيَّ عِبَارَةً مُشَابِهَةً لِهَذِهِ الْعِبَارَةِ عَنْ كِتَابِ " جَامِعِ بَيَانِ الْعِلْمِ " لِابْنِ عَبْدِ الْبَرِّ وَفِيهَا: وَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ حَنْبَلٍ: لَا يُفْلِحُ صَاحِبُ الْكَلَامِ أَبَدًا. وَانْظُرْ صَوْنَ الْمَنْطِقِ ص [٠ - ٩] ٣٦، جَامِعَ بَيَانِ الْعِلْمِ ٢/٩٥.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies