Minhaj as-SunnahIbn Taimiya

it may be said to him] (1): Ahl al-Sunnah have a greater claim than the Shi'a to declaring Him exalted above resemblance to created beings. No sect within the Muslim community is known to engage more extensively than the Shi'i sects in likening Allah to created beings and ascribing corporeality to Him in ways that contradict reason and revelation. Indeed, all the heresiographical works ascribe to the early Shi'i leaders, concerning such resemblance and corporeality, doctrines contrary to reason and revelation, the like of which is not known from any other sect. Moreover, the early and later Imāmiyya contradict one another on this issue: their early authorities went to extremes in likening Allah to created beings and ascribing corporeality to Him, whereas their later authorities went to extremes in negating and denying the divine attributes. In this they aligned themselves specifically with the Jahmiyya and the Mu'tazila, unlike the other sects of the Muslim community.

As for Ahl al-Sunnah, who affirm the caliphate of the first three caliphs, all their leading authorities and well-known groups agree that Allah Most High has no equal or likeness. Those among the groups affirming the caliphate of the first three who applied the term “body” to Allah—such as the Karrāmiyya—are closer to sound transmitted evidence and clear rational evidence than those among the Imāmiyya who applied the term “body” to Him.

The positions of the Imāmiyya on this matter have been related by more than one of their own scholars (2), as well as by others, just as

(1) There is a substantial lacuna in the following passage in manuscripts (N) and (M). It begins with the words, “Ahl al-Sunnah have a greater claim to declaring Him exalted above…” and ends on p. 110 at the words, “The point here is that Ahl al-Sunnah…” We shall indicate the end of the lacuna there, Allah willing. (2) In his biographical entry on Hishām ibn al-Hakam (*Tanqīh al-Maqāl*, 3:294–301), al-Māmaqānī acknowledges the numerous reports transmitted from Hishām concerning corporealism; al-Kulaynī included five of them in *al-Kāfī*. Al-Māmaqānī quotes Hishām’s words from one of these five reports (p. [0–9]00): “Allah is a solid, luminous body.” He also transmits al-Barqī’s statement that Hishām had been a disciple of Abū Shākir (al-Daysānī), the heretic, and that he was a reprehensible corporealist. In al-Kashshī’s *Akhbār al-Rijāl*, in the biographical entry on Hishām ibn Sālim al-Jawālīqī (p. [0–9]83), it is related that he claimed Allah has a form and that Adam was created in the likeness of the Lord. He would then point to his side and the hair on his head to illustrate the resemblance.
فَيُقَالُ لَهُ] (١) : أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ أَحَقُّ بِتَنْزِيهِهِ عَنْ مُشَابَهَةِ الْمَخْلُوقَاتِ مِنَ الشِّيعَةِ، فَإِنَّ التَّشْبِيهَ وَالتَّجْسِيمَ الْمُخَالِفَ لِلْعَقْلِ وَالنَّقْلِ لَا يُعْرَفُ فِي أَحَدٍ مِنْ طَوَائِفِ الْأُمَّةِ أَكْثَرَ مِنْهُ فِي طَوَائِفِ الشِّيعَةِ، وَهَذِهِ كُتُبُ الْمَقَالَاتِ كُلُّهَا تُخْبِرُ عَنْ أَئِمَّةِ الشِّيعَةِ الْمُتَقَدِّمِينَ مِنَ الْمَقَالَاتِ الْمُخَالِفَةِ لِلْعَقْلِ وَالنَّقْلِ فِي التَّشْبِيهِ وَالتَّجْسِيمِ بِمَا لَا يُعْرَفُ نَظِيرُهُ عَنْ أَحَدٍ مِنْ سَائِرِ الطَّوَائِفِ، ثُمَّ قُدَمَاءُ الْإِمَامِيَّةِ وَمُتَأَخِّرُوهُمْ مُتَنَاقِضُونَ فِي هَذَا الْبَابِ، فَقُدَمَاؤُهُمْ غَلَوْا فِي التَّشْبِيهِ وَالتَّجْسِيمِ، وَمُتَأَخِّرُوهُمْ غَلَوْا فِي النَّفْيِ وَالتَّعْطِيلِ، فَشَارَكُوا فِي ذَلِكَ الْجَهْمِيَّةَ وَالْمُعْتَزِلَةَ دُونَ سَائِرِ طَوَائِفِ الْأُمَّةِ. وَأَمَّا أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ الْمُثْبِتُونَ لِخِلَافَةِ الثَّلَاثَةِ، فَجَمِيعُ أَئِمَّتِهِمْ وَطَوَائِفِهِمُ الْمَشْهُورَةِ مُتَّفِقُونَ عَلَى نَفْيِ التَّمْثِيلِ عَنِ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى، وَالَّذِينَ أَطْلَقُوا لَفْظَ " الْجِسْمِ " عَلَى اللَّهِ مِنَ الطَّوَائِفِ الْمُثْبِتِينَ لِخِلَافَةِ الثَّلَاثَةِ كَالْكَرَّامِيَّةِ، هُمْ أَقْرَبُ إِلَى صَحِيحِ الْمَنْقُولِ وَصَرِيحِ الْمَعْقُولِ مِنَ الَّذِينَ أَطْلَقُوا لَفْظَ " الْجِسْمِ " مِنَ الْإِمَامِيَّةِ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ أَقْوَالَ الْإِمَامِيَّةِ فِي ذَلِكَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمْ (٢) وَمِنْ غَيْرِهِمْ، كَمَا
(١) يُوجَدُ فِي الْكَلَامِ التَّالِي سَقْطٌ كَبِيرٌ فِي نُسْخَةِ " ن "، " م " يَبْدَأُ مِنْ قَوْلِهِ: أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ أَحَقُّ بِتَنْزِيهِهِ، وَيَنْتَهِي فِي ص ١١٠ عِنْدَ قَوْلِهِ: وَالْمَقْصُودُ هُنَا أَنَّ أَهْلَ السُّنَّةِ، وَسَنُشِيرُ إِلَى نِهَايَةِ السَّقْطِ هُنَاكُ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ. (٢) يَعْتَرِفُ الْمَامِقَانِيُّ فِي تَرْجَمَةِ هِشَامِ بْنِ الْحَكَمِ (تَنْقِيحِ الْمَقَالِ ٣/٢٩٤ - ٣٠١) بِكَثْرَةِ الْأَخْبَارِ الْمَرْوِيَّةِ عَنْ هِشَامٍ فِي التَّجْسِيمِ حَتَّى أَنَّ الْكِلِّينِيَّ ذَكَرَ خَمْسَةً مِنْهَا فِي " الْكَافِي " وَيَنْقُلُ الْمَامِقَانِيُّ عَنْ هِشَامٍ نَصَّ خَبَرٍ مِنْ هَذِهِ الْأَخْبَارِ الْخَمْسَةِ (ص [٠ - ٩] ٠٠) وَفِيهِ يَقُولُ هِشَامٌ: " إِنَّ اللَّهَ جِسْمٌ صَمَدِيٌّ نُورِيٌّ " كَمَا يَنْقُلُ عَنِ الْبَرْقِيِّ قَوْلَهُ إِنَّ هِشَامًا كَانَ مِنْ غِلْمَانِ أَبِي شَاكِرٍ (الدِّيصَانِيِّ) الزِّنْدِيقِ وَأَنَّهُ كَانَ جِسْمِيًّا رَدِيئًا. وَفِي (أَخْبَارِ الرِّجَالِ) لِلْكَشِّيِّ فِي تَرْجَمَةِ هِشَامِ بْنِ سَالِمٍ الْجَوَالِيقِيِّ (ص [٠ - ٩] ٨٣) أَنَّهُ كَانَ يَزْعُمُ أَنَّ اللَّهَ صُورَةٌ وَأَنَّ آدَمَ خُلِقَ عَلَى مِثْلِ الرَّبِّ ثُمَّ يُشِيرُ إِلَى جَنْبِهِ وَشَعَرِ رَأْسِهِ لِيُبَيِّنَ الْمُمَاثَلَةَ.

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies